PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGLD.L vs. SGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGLD.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGLD.L is traded in USD, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SGLD.L having a 3.72% return and SGLN.L slightly lower at 3.64%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SGLD.L having a 13.41% annualized return and SGLN.L not far ahead at 13.44%.


SGLD.L

1D
0.69%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
3.72%
6M
6.06%
1Y
32.43%
3Y*
31.54%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*
13.41%

SGLN.L

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
3.64%
6M
6.20%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
31.47%
5Y*
18.86%
10Y*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLD.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGLD.L
Invesco Physical Gold ETC
3.72%64.87%26.23%13.36%-0.08%-4.08%24.18%18.33%-1.30%11.54%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
3.64%65.25%26.06%12.89%-0.12%-3.46%23.28%19.23%-1.55%11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLD.L and SGLN.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011

0.91

The correlation between SGLD.L and SGLN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGLD.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLD.L
SGLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SGLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SGLN.L
SGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLD.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGLD.LSGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

1.85

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.82

4.74

+0.07

SGLD.L vs. SGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLD.L and SGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGLD.LSGLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.33

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

1.08

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.85

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.46

+0.12

Drawdowns

SGLD.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.21%, roughly equal to the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLD.L and SGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGLD.LSGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.21%

-45.21%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.34%

-17.50%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.34%

-17.50%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.12%

-21.27%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.12%

-21.27%

+0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.61%

-15.90%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-19.80%

+1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.72%

6.83%

-0.11%

Volatility

SGLD.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) at 5.74%. This indicates that SGLD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGLD.LSGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

5.74%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.72%

21.04%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.72%

24.26%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

17.52%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

15.86%

-0.36%

SGLD.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SGLD.L and SGLN.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGLD.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGLD.L nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SGLD.L and SGLN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGLD.L and SGLN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

SGLD.L tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGLD.L and SGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer