SGLD.L vs. RMAP.L
SGLD.L (Invesco Physical Gold ETC) and RMAP.L (HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC) are both Gold funds - SGLD.L tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM while RMAP.L tracks the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGLD.L returned 17.57%/yr vs 17.45%/yr for RMAP.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SGLD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for RMAP.L.
Performance
SGLD.L vs. RMAP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGLD.L is traded in USD, while RMAP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RMAP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SGLD.L having a -6.68% return and RMAP.L slightly lower at -6.85%.
SGLD.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -10.72%
- YTD
- -6.68%
- 6M
- -10.51%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- 27.67%
- 5Y*
- 17.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
RMAP.L
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -10.85%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 6M
- -10.53%
- 1Y
- 20.31%
- 3Y*
- 27.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.45%
- 10Y*
- —
SGLD.L vs. RMAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLD.L Invesco Physical Gold ETC | -6.68% | 64.87% | 26.23% | 13.36% | -0.08% | -4.08% | 20.02% |
RMAP.L HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC | -6.85% | 65.08% | 25.86% | 12.74% | -0.20% | -3.84% | -8.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLD.L and RMAP.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SGLD.L and RMAP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLD.L vs. RMAP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGLD.L
RMAP.L
SGLD.L vs. RMAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGLD.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 0.82 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | 2.36 | +0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGLD.L vs. RMAP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.21%, which is greater than RMAP.L's maximum drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLD.L and RMAP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLD.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.21% | -30.06% | -15.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.36% | -24.70% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.36% | -24.70% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.36% | -24.70% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.07% | -24.48% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.95% | -9.41% | -8.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.36% | 8.57% | -0.21% |
Volatility
SGLD.L vs. RMAP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) at 8.50%. This indicates that SGLD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLD.L | RMAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 8.50% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.04% | 22.13% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.95% | 25.21% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 22.69% | -5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 23.55% | -7.91% |
SGLD.L vs. RMAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RMAP.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGLD.L vs. RMAP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGLD.L nor RMAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SGLD.L and RMAP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SGLD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for RMAP.L.
SGLD.L tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while RMAP.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLD.L and 0.22% for RMAP.L.
Find the right allocation for SGLD.L and RMAP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer