SGJP.L vs. CNKY.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SGJP.L (iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CNKY.L (iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Japan Equities funds from iShares tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SGJP.L returned 15.15%/yr vs 20.46%/yr for CNKY.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SGJP.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for CNKY.L.

Performance

SGJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SGJP.L is traded in GBP, while CNKY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNKY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGJP.L achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly lower than CNKY.L's 31.80% return.

SGJP.L

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 17.03%
• 6M: 16.27%
• 1Y: 35.44%
• 3Y*: 15.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNKY.L

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: 10.78%
• YTD: 31.80%
• 6M: 29.05%
• 1Y: 63.73%
• 3Y*: 20.46%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: 12.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SGJP.L iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	17.03%	16.65%	8.33%	13.55%	-7.58%	2.94%
CNKY.L iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)	31.80%	20.64%	9.15%	15.02%	-10.53%	-0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SGJP.L and CNKY.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.91

The correlation between SGJP.L and CNKY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

SGJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SGJP.L	CNKY.L
Industrials	25.2%	18.8%
Technology	20.8%	32.6%
Financial Services	19.0%	3.1%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	16.4%
Communication Services	8.6%	14.0%
Healthcare	6.8%	6.4%
Basic Materials	3.1%	4.1%
Real Estate	2.5%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	3.0%
Utilities	0.6%	0.2%
Energy	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

SGJP.L vs. CNKY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGJP.L

SGJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
SGJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SGJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SGJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SGJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SGJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

CNKY.L

CNKY.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
CNKY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CNKY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
CNKY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CNKY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CNKY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGJP.L	CNKY.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	2.81	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	3.90	-1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.47	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	4.76	-1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.33	14.40	-4.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the CNKY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGJP.L and CNKY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGJP.L	CNKY.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	2.81	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.67	-0.04

Drawdowns

SGJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGJP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.79%, smaller than the maximum CNKY.L drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGJP.L and CNKY.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGJP.L	CNKY.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.79%	-23.61%	+4.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.77%	-13.32%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.67%	-19.39%	+4.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-1.22%	+0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.13%	-7.33%	+1.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	4.41%	-1.10%

Volatility

SGJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) is 4.09%, while iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that SGJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNKY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGJP.L	CNKY.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	6.86%	-2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.78%	17.88%	-3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.42%	22.59%	-4.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.94%	17.76%	-1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.94%	17.22%	-1.28%

SGJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGJP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CNKY.L's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGJP.L vs. CNKY.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGJP.L nor CNKY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGJP.L and CNKY.L in my portfolio?

SGJP.L and CNKY.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SGJP.L or CNKY.L?

On fees, SGJP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGJP.L or CNKY.L?

SGJP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CNKY.L.

What is the main difference between SGJP.L and CNKY.L?

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SGJP.L and 0.48% for CNKY.L.