CNKY.L vs. LGUG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L).
CNKY.L and LGUG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNKY.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Jan 25, 2010. LGUG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Nov 7, 2018. Both CNKY.L and LGUG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNKY.L or LGUG.L.
Key characteristics
| CNKY.L | LGUG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.24% | 26.36% |
| 1Y Return | 13.97% | 32.32% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.06% | 11.33% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.00% | 18.69% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.81 | 2.79 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.20 | 3.93 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.54 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.93 | 4.84 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.22 | 19.46 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.21% | 1.64% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.91% | 11.42% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.61% | -24.75% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.12% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNKY.L and LGUG.L is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CNKY.L vs. LGUG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CNKY.L achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly lower than LGUG.L's 26.36% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNKY.L vs. LGUG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNKY.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUG.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNKY.L vs. LGUG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNKY.L vs. LGUG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNKY.L nor LGUG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CNKY.L vs. LGUG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNKY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, roughly equal to the maximum LGUG.L drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNKY.L and LGUG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNKY.L vs. LGUG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUG.L) at 3.31%. This indicates that CNKY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGUG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.