PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CNKY.L vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CNKY.LVOO
YTD Return8.24%26.88%
1Y Return13.97%37.59%
3Y Return (Ann)2.06%10.23%
5Y Return (Ann)5.00%15.93%
10Y Return (Ann)8.87%13.41%
Sharpe Ratio0.813.06
Sortino Ratio1.204.08
Omega Ratio1.161.58
Calmar Ratio0.934.43
Martin Ratio2.2220.25
Ulcer Index6.21%1.85%
Daily Std Dev16.91%12.23%
Max Drawdown-23.61%-33.99%
Current Drawdown-6.12%-0.30%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CNKY.L and VOO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CNKY.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CNKY.L achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 26.88% return. Over the past 10 years, CNKY.L has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.87%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.41% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.23%
13.46%
CNKY.L
VOO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNKY.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNKY.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


CNKY.L
iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)
Expense ratio chart for CNKY.L: current value at 0.48% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.48%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNKY.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNKY.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNKY.L, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.78
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNKY.L, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNKY.L, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNKY.L, currently valued at 0.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNKY.L, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.58
VOO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VOO, currently valued at 2.76, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VOO, currently valued at 3.69, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.69
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VOO, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VOO, currently valued at 3.94, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.94
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VOO, currently valued at 18.01, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0018.01

CNKY.L vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNKY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNKY.L and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.78
2.76
CNKY.L
VOO

Dividends

CNKY.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CNKY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CNKY.L
iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.23%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%1.84%

Drawdowns

CNKY.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNKY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNKY.L and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.60%
-0.30%
CNKY.L
VOO

Volatility

CNKY.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.89%. This indicates that CNKY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.16%
3.89%
CNKY.L
VOO