SGHC vs. SFM
SGHC (Super Group (SGHC) Limited) and SFM (Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.) are both stocks. SGHC operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while SFM operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, SGHC returned 64.45%/yr vs 34.94%/yr for SFM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SGHC vs. SFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGHC achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than SFM's 0.64% return.
SGHC
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- 1Y
- 55.45%
- 3Y*
- 64.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFM
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- -5.95%
- 1Y
- -53.15%
- 3Y*
- 34.94%
- 5Y*
- 23.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
SGHC vs. SFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited | 12.60% | 95.00% | 107.65% | 5.67% | -63.64% |
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 0.64% | -37.30% | 164.12% | 48.63% | 20.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGHC and SFM is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.12 |
The correlation between SGHC and SFM shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SGHC:
$6.60B
SFM:
$7.66B
SGHC:
$0.40
SFM:
$5.20
SGHC:
32.33
SFM:
15.43
SGHC:
1.37
SFM:
0.56
SGHC:
3.07
SFM:
0.88
SGHC:
9.65
SFM:
5.34
SGHC:
$2.15B
SFM:
$8.90B
SGHC:
$617.43M
SFM:
$3.41B
SGHC:
$394.23M
SFM:
$837.54M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGHC vs. SFM — Risk / Return Rank
SGHC
SFM
SGHC vs. SFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGHC | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.76 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | -0.86 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | -1.19 | +4.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGHC | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | -1.17 | +2.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.15 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
SGHC vs. SFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGHC drawdown since its inception was -76.02%, roughly equal to the maximum SFM drawdown of -72.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGHC and SFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGHC | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.02% | -72.88% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.67% | -62.17% | +24.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.67% | -63.48% | +25.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.98% | -55.34% | +49.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.78% | -40.27% | -5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.38% | 44.75% | -28.37% |
Volatility
SGHC vs. SFM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is 10.20%, while Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that SGHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGHC | SFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.20% | 13.05% | -2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.62% | 29.80% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.43% | 45.68% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.59% | 39.19% | +20.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.59% | 37.77% | +21.82% |
Dividends
SGHC vs. SFM - Dividend Comparison
SGHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while SFM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited | 3.22% | 1.34% | 4.01% |
Financials
SGHC vs. SFM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Super Group (SGHC) Limited and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SGHC vs. SFM - Profitability Comparison
SGHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a gross profit of 140.00M and revenue of 578.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.2%.
SFM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.28M and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
SGHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported an operating income of 100.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
SFM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported an operating income of 215.31M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
SGHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a net income of 67.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
SFM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a net income of 163.72M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGHC and SFM have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFM has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to SGHC (10.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGHC dropped -76.02% vs SFM's -72.88%.
SGHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGHC and SFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer