SGGDX vs. EPGFX
SGGDX (First Eagle Gold Fund) and EPGFX (EuroPac Gold Fund) are both Gold funds. Over the past 10 years, SGGDX returned 10.55%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for EPGFX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SGGDX charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for EPGFX.
Performance
SGGDX vs. EPGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGGDX achieves a -8.70% return, which is significantly lower than EPGFX's -7.80% return. Over the past 10 years, SGGDX has outperformed EPGFX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while EPGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
SGGDX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- 6M
- -16.92%
- YTD
- -8.70%
- 1Y
- 41.55%
- 3Y*
- 33.56%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
EPGFX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- 6M
- -16.16%
- YTD
- -7.80%
- 1Y
- 40.19%
- 3Y*
- 31.14%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
SGGDX vs. EPGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGGDX First Eagle Gold Fund | -8.70% | 128.39% | 10.32% | 7.01% | -1.56% | -7.78% | 29.63% | 38.51% | -15.90% | 8.12% |
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund | -7.80% | 129.06% | 8.51% | 2.31% | -14.00% | -18.06% | 36.99% | 37.25% | -13.85% | 12.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGGDX and EPGFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SGGDX and EPGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGGDX vs. EPGFX — Risk / Return Rank
SGGDX
EPGFX
SGGDX vs. EPGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Gold Fund (SGGDX) and EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGGDX | EPGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.14 | 3.23 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGGDX vs. EPGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGGDX drawdown since its inception was -70.69%, which is greater than EPGFX's maximum drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGGDX and EPGFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGGDX | EPGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.69% | -56.70% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.69% | -31.16% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.69% | -31.16% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.02% | -44.99% | +10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.16% | -51.03% | +8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.24% | -29.69% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.42% | -22.06% | -7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.76% | 13.36% | +0.40% |
Volatility
SGGDX vs. EPGFX - Volatility Comparison
First Eagle Gold Fund (SGGDX) and EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) have volatilities of 12.78% and 12.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGGDX | EPGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.78% | 12.39% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.17% | 34.17% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.25% | 40.63% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.33% | 32.96% | -3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 32.59% | -5.19% |
SGGDX vs. EPGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGGDX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EPGFX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGGDX vs. EPGFX - Dividend Comparison
SGGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than EPGFX's 7.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund | 7.44% | 6.86% | 10.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.49% | 8.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.56% | 19.31% |
SGGDX First Eagle Gold Fund | 1.18% | 1.08% | 5.26% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, SGGDX and EPGFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SGGDX has higher volatility (12.78%) compared to EPGFX (12.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGGDX dropped -70.69% vs EPGFX's -56.70%.
SGGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGGDX and EPGFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer