SGDM vs. SCHD
SGDM (Sprott Gold Miners ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGDM is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGDM returned 11.84%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGDM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
SGDM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGDM achieves a -4.58% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDM has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 11.84%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.
SGDM
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -14.98%
- YTD
- -4.58%
- 6M
- -4.02%
- 1Y
- 43.72%
- 3Y*
- 37.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
SGDM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | -4.58% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 21.85% | 44.27% | -15.14% | 10.46% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGDM and SCHD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.13 |
The correlation between SGDM and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SGDM vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SGDM
SCHD
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SGDM
SCHD
Communication Services
SGDM
-
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
SGDM
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
SGDM
-
SCHD
Energy
SGDM
-
SCHD
Financial Services
SGDM
-
SCHD
Healthcare
SGDM
-
SCHD
Industrials
SGDM
-
SCHD
Real Estate
SGDM
-
SCHD
-
Technology
SGDM
-
SCHD
Utilities
SGDM
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGDM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
SGDM
SCHD
SGDM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGDM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.43 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 5.70 | -4.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | 13.97 | -10.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGDM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGDM drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDM and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGDM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.95% | -33.37% | -21.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.96% | -4.61% | -31.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.96% | -16.13% | -19.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.06% | -16.85% | -28.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.69% | -33.37% | -16.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.31% | -0.03% | -30.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -3.31% | -22.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.93% | 1.89% | +11.04% |
Volatility
SGDM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a higher volatility of 16.53% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that SGDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGDM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.53% | 3.05% | +13.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.64% | 7.53% | +31.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.24% | 10.93% | +35.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.11% | 14.38% | +21.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.97% | 16.72% | +20.25% |
SGDM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGDM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGDM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
SGDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.09% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGDM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGDM has higher volatility (16.53%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDM dropped -54.95% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 11.84% for SGDM. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDM.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.09% for SGDM.
SGDM is categorized as Gold, while SCHD is Dividend. SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDM and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGDM and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer