SGDJ vs. CUT
SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) and CUT (Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF) are both Materials funds - SGDJ tracks the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index while CUT tracks the Beacon Global Timber Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ returned 11.97%/yr vs 3.93%/yr for CUT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGDJ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CUT.
Performance
SGDJ vs. CUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than CUT's -5.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ has outperformed CUT with an annualized return of 11.97%, while CUT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.93% annualized return.
SGDJ
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- 1Y
- 80.74%
- 3Y*
- 49.76%
- 5Y*
- 17.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
CUT
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- -5.58%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- -7.17%
- 3Y*
- 0.54%
- 5Y*
- -4.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.93%
SGDJ vs. CUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 1.97% | 174.44% | 19.35% | 6.66% | -27.60% | -15.12% | 47.91% | 37.00% | -25.63% | 5.94% |
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | -5.58% | -5.92% | 1.82% | 8.65% | -16.38% | 12.29% | 18.05% | 23.35% | -21.70% | 30.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGDJ and CUT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015 | 0.25 |
The correlation between SGDJ and CUT shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SGDJ vs. CUT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SGDJ
CUT
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SGDJ
CUT
Communication Services
SGDJ
-
CUT
-
Consumer Cyclical
SGDJ
-
CUT
Consumer Defensive
SGDJ
-
CUT
Energy
SGDJ
-
CUT
-
Financial Services
SGDJ
-
CUT
Healthcare
SGDJ
-
CUT
-
Industrials
SGDJ
-
CUT
Real Estate
SGDJ
-
CUT
Technology
SGDJ
-
CUT
Utilities
SGDJ
-
CUT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGDJ vs. CUT — Risk / Return Rank
SGDJ
CUT
SGDJ vs. CUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGDJ | CUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.95 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | -0.37 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | -0.81 | +7.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGDJ | CUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | -0.39 | +2.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | -0.23 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.20 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.11 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
SGDJ vs. CUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum CUT drawdown of -70.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and CUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGDJ | CUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -70.03% | +10.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.22% | -19.62% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.22% | -22.23% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.90% | -30.40% | -24.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.27% | -45.76% | -13.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.66% | -22.99% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.25% | -15.26% | -10.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.50% | 8.88% | +3.62% |
Volatility
SGDJ vs. CUT - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a higher volatility of 13.18% compared to Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) at 5.90%. This indicates that SGDJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGDJ | CUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.18% | 5.90% | +7.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.87% | 14.05% | +25.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.34% | 18.57% | +29.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.28% | 18.48% | +21.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.74% | 20.22% | +20.52% |
SGDJ vs. CUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CUT's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGDJ vs. CUT - Dividend Comparison
SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than CUT's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF | 2.61% | 2.46% | 3.05% | 2.44% | 2.58% | 1.57% | 1.65% | 2.67% | 3.43% | 1.57% | 2.08% | 1.52% |
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 8.21% | 8.37% | 6.55% | 4.55% | 2.46% | 2.20% | 1.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.77% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGDJ and CUT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGDJ has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to CUT (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs CUT's -70.03%.
On 10-year performance, SGDJ leads with 11.97% vs 3.93% for CUT. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CUT has been the lower-risk option at 5.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CUT.
SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 2.61% for CUT.
SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while CUT tracks Beacon Global Timber Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 0.55% for CUT.
SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGDJ and CUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer