PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFYX vs. RPAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFYX vs. RPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SFYX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RPAR

1D
-0.47%
1M
1.78%
YTD
7.53%
6M
7.10%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFYX vs. RPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SFYX
SoFi Next 500 ETF
5.66%14.25%14.45%17.70%-22.88%18.89%17.63%2.09%
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
7.53%17.91%0.06%6.03%-22.82%7.56%19.40%0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SFYX and RPAR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019

0.48

The correlation between SFYX and RPAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SFYX vs. RPAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFYX
RPAR

Industrials

20.5%
2.1%

Technology

16.9%
0.1%

Financial Services

15.9%
35.9%

Healthcare

12.1%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
0.1%

Real Estate

6.4%
-0.0%

Communication Services

4.5%
4.9%

Energy

4.5%
5.9%

Basic Materials

3.2%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
0.3%

Utilities

2.2%
0.2%

Industrials

SFYX
20.5%
RPAR
2.1%

Technology

SFYX
16.9%
RPAR
0.1%

Financial Services

SFYX
15.9%
RPAR
35.9%

Healthcare

SFYX
12.1%
RPAR
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SFYX
9.9%
RPAR
0.1%

Real Estate

SFYX
6.4%
RPAR
-0.0%

Communication Services

SFYX
4.5%
RPAR
4.9%

Energy

SFYX
4.5%
RPAR
5.9%

Basic Materials

SFYX
3.2%
RPAR
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

SFYX
3.0%
RPAR
0.3%

Utilities

SFYX
2.2%
RPAR
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFYX vs. RPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFYX

RPAR
RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFYX vs. RPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SFYX vs. RPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFYXRPARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

Drawdowns

SFYX vs. RPAR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFYXRPARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

Volatility

SFYX vs. RPAR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFYXRPARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.69%

SFYX vs. RPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RPAR's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFYX vs. RPAR - Dividend Comparison

SFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than RPAR's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
2.07%2.55%2.51%3.16%4.01%2.02%0.76%0.23%
SFYX
SoFi Next 500 ETF
1.36%1.44%1.25%1.51%1.56%0.90%1.16%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFYX and RPAR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SFYX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SFYX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RPAR.

RPAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.36% for SFYX.

SFYX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while RPAR is Hedge Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFYX and 0.51% for RPAR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFYX and RPAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer