SFYX vs. BBHM
SFYX (SoFi Next 500 ETF) and BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - SFYX tracks the Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index while BBHM tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SFYX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BBHM.
Performance
SFYX vs. BBHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFYX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBHM
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYX vs. BBHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 5.66% | 6.75% |
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 1.78% | 2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFYX and BBHM is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFYX vs. BBHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFYX | BBHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.50 | — |
Drawdowns
SFYX vs. BBHM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFYX | BBHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -5.28% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.71% | — |
Volatility
SFYX vs. BBHM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFYX | BBHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 17.46% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 17.46% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.46% | — |
SFYX vs. BBHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BBHM's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFYX vs. BBHM - Dividend Comparison
SFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 1.36% | 1.44% | 1.25% | 1.51% | 1.56% | 0.90% | 1.16% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFYX and BBHM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.
SFYX has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.
SFYX tracks Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index, while BBHM tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and BBH. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFYX and 0.81% for BBHM.
Find the right allocation for SFYX and BBHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer