SFYI vs. ANV
SFYI (SoFi Social 50 Income ETF) and ANV (GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SFYI charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for ANV.
Performance
SFYI vs. ANV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFYI
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANV
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYI vs. ANV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | -0.91% |
ANV GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF | 0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFYI and ANV is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFYI vs. ANV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI) and GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF (ANV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFYI vs. ANV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFYI drawdown since its inception was -2.10%, smaller than the maximum ANV drawdown of -2.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYI and ANV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFYI | ANV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -2.82% | +0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -0.36% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -0.59% | -0.19% |
Volatility
SFYI vs. ANV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFYI | ANV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.64% | 10.38% | +3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 10.38% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 10.38% | +3.26% |
SFYI vs. ANV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYI has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than ANV's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFYI vs. ANV - Dividend Comparison
SFYI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ANV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ANV GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF | 6.97% |
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFYI and ANV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYI is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYI is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for ANV.
ANV has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 0.00% for SFYI.
They also come from different issuers: Tidal and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for SFYI and 1.07% for ANV.
Find the right allocation for SFYI and ANV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer