SFY vs. SPUS
SFY (SoFi Select 500 ETF) and SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SFY returned 15.86%/yr vs 17.46%/yr for SPUS. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFY charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SPUS.
Performance
SFY vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFY achieves a 14.51% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 15.82% return.
SFY
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- 14.51%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 35.49%
- 3Y*
- 27.51%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
SPUS
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 40.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- —
SFY vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 14.51% | 22.67% | 29.81% | 29.36% | -22.84% | 28.03% | 24.52% | 1.46% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 15.82% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFY and SPUS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SFY and SPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
SFY vs. SPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFY
SPUS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SFY
SPUS
Communication Services
SFY
SPUS
Financial Services
SFY
SPUS
-
Healthcare
SFY
SPUS
Consumer Cyclical
SFY
SPUS
Industrials
SFY
SPUS
Consumer Defensive
SFY
SPUS
Energy
SFY
SPUS
Utilities
SFY
SPUS
Real Estate
SFY
SPUS
Basic Materials
SFY
SPUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFY vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
SFY
SPUS
SFY vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFY | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.49 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 3.79 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.43 | 16.32 | -1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFY | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.86 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.91 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.91 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SFY vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFY drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFY and SPUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFY | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | -30.80% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -10.66% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.04% | -22.82% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.72% | -28.06% | +0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -0.86% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -6.21% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 2.47% | 0.00% |
Volatility
SFY vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) have volatilities of 4.04% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFY | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 4.00% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.09% | 10.84% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 14.16% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 19.23% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 21.28% | -1.08% |
SFY vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFY has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFY vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
SFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than SPUS's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 0.84% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 0.90% | 1.18% | 1.02% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.52% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, SFY and SPUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SFY has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to SPUS (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFY dropped -33.25% vs SPUS's -30.80%.
On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.46% vs 15.86% for SFY. On fees, SFY is cheaper at 0.00% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 15.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFY is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPUS.
SFY has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.52% for SPUS.
SFY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPUS is S&P 500. SFY tracks Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFY and 0.45% for SPUS.
SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFY and SPUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer