SFY vs. SCHP
SFY (SoFi Select 500 ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SFY returned 14.99%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for SCHP. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SFY charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
SFY vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFY achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 1.42% return.
SFY
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 11.40%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- 1Y
- 29.80%
- 3Y*
- 25.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.99%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
SFY vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 11.40% | 22.67% | 29.81% | 29.36% | -22.84% | 28.03% | 24.52% | 13.72% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.42% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 5.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFY and SCHP is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.11 |
SFY vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFY
SCHP
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SFY
SCHP
-
Communication Services
SFY
SCHP
-
Financial Services
SFY
SCHP
Healthcare
SFY
SCHP
-
Consumer Cyclical
SFY
SCHP
Industrials
SFY
SCHP
-
Consumer Defensive
SFY
SCHP
-
Energy
SFY
SCHP
-
Utilities
SFY
SCHP
-
Real Estate
SFY
SCHP
-
Basic Materials
SFY
SCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFY vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
SFY
SCHP
SFY vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFY | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.25 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.45 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.66 | 7.41 | +4.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFY vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFY drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFY and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFY | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | -14.26% | -18.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -1.93% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.04% | -4.48% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.72% | -14.26% | -13.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -0.44% | -3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -3.93% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 0.64% | +1.92% |
Volatility
SFY vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.02%. This indicates that SFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFY | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 1.02% | +5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 2.24% | +9.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 3.30% | +11.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 6.12% | +13.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 5.59% | +14.65% |
SFY vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFY has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SFY vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
SFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than SCHP's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 0.86% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 0.90% | 1.18% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFY and SCHP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFY has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFY dropped -33.25% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 5-year performance, SFY leads with 14.99% vs 1.06% for SCHP. On fees, SFY is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SFY has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 1.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFY is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for SCHP.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 0.86% for SFY.
SFY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SFY tracks Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFY and 0.03% for SCHP.
SFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFY and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer