SFSNX vs. SWMCX
SFSNX (Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund) and SWMCX (Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SFSNX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SWMCX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab. Over the past 5 years, SFSNX returned 7.30%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for SWMCX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFSNX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWMCX.
Performance
SFSNX vs. SWMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFSNX achieves a 15.97% return, which is significantly higher than SWMCX's 12.72% return.
SFSNX
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 15.97%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 32.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
SWMCX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- —
SFSNX vs. SWMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 15.97% | 7.66% | 8.99% | 20.15% | -14.79% | 30.91% | 8.49% | 24.44% | -12.26% | 0.40% |
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | 12.72% | 10.54% | 15.28% | 17.20% | -17.31% | 22.55% | 17.03% | 30.46% | -9.16% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFSNX and SWMCX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SFSNX and SWMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SFSNX vs. SWMCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFSNX
SWMCX
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
SFSNX
SWMCX
Technology
SFSNX
SWMCX
Financial Services
SFSNX
SWMCX
Consumer Cyclical
SFSNX
SWMCX
Real Estate
SFSNX
SWMCX
Healthcare
SFSNX
SWMCX
Energy
SFSNX
SWMCX
Basic Materials
SFSNX
SWMCX
Consumer Defensive
SFSNX
SWMCX
Communication Services
SFSNX
SWMCX
Utilities
SFSNX
SWMCX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFSNX vs. SWMCX — Risk / Return Rank
SFSNX
SWMCX
SFSNX vs. SWMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFSNX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 2.87 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 11.01 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFSNX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.74 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.46 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.52 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SFSNX vs. SWMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFSNX drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, which is greater than SWMCX's maximum drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFSNX and SWMCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFSNX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.32% | -40.34% | -17.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -8.15% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.91% | -21.07% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.91% | -26.09% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -6.63% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.12% | +0.77% |
Volatility
SFSNX vs. SWMCX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) at 3.27%. This indicates that SFSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFSNX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 3.27% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | 9.96% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.10% | 13.42% | +3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 18.25% | +2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.28% | 20.64% | +2.64% |
SFSNX vs. SWMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFSNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SWMCX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SFSNX vs. SWMCX - Dividend Comparison
SFSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than SWMCX's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 1.37% | 7.05% | 12.27% | 1.42% | 3.66% | 11.55% | 6.88% | 1.86% | 6.37% |
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | 1.89% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.49% | 1.59% | 2.93% | 1.45% | 2.44% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SFSNX and SWMCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SFSNX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to SWMCX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFSNX dropped -58.32% vs SWMCX's -40.34%.
SFSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFSNX and SWMCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer