PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFHYX vs. HSAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFHYX vs. HSAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund (SFHYX) and Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFHYX achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than HSAFX's -2.51% return.


SFHYX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.04%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.18%
1Y
9.07%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
7.31%

HSAFX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
-2.51%
6M
-3.59%
1Y
-1.11%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFHYX vs. HSAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SFHYX
Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund
1.21%10.99%2.78%9.94%-10.31%8.05%37.42%2.90%
HSAFX
Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund
-2.51%7.78%1.74%0.65%4.42%7.23%11.20%-0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SFHYX and HSAFX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2019

0.22

The correlation between SFHYX and HSAFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFHYX vs. HSAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFHYX
SFHYX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SFHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SFHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

HSAFX
HSAFX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HSAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HSAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFHYX vs. HSAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund (SFHYX) and Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFHYXHSAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.98

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

-0.13

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

-0.35

+6.81

SFHYX vs. HSAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFHYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the HSAFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFHYX and HSAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFHYX vs. HSAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFHYX drawdown since its inception was -17.34%, which is greater than HSAFX's maximum drawdown of -5.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFHYX and HSAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFHYXHSAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.34%

-5.54%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.75%

-5.34%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.80%

-5.34%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.71%

-5.34%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-4.74%

+3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-1.58%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.01%

-0.61%

Volatility

SFHYX vs. HSAFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund (SFHYX) is 1.69%, while Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that SFHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFHYXHSAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

2.03%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.85%

4.06%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.73%

5.80%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.23%

4.90%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.29%

5.15%

+1.14%

SFHYX vs. HSAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFHYX has a 2.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HSAFX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFHYX vs. HSAFX - Dividend Comparison

SFHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, more than HSAFX's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSAFX
Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund
1.81%1.90%2.15%1.60%19.12%3.37%5.55%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SFHYX
Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund
9.43%9.54%5.68%4.62%4.19%10.21%13.57%4.95%2.55%10.24%4.93%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFHYX and HSAFX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HSAFX has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to SFHYX (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFHYX dropped -17.34% vs HSAFX's -5.54%.

SFHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFHYX and HSAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer