PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSAFX vs. MOJOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSAFX vs. MOJOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) and Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSAFX achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly lower than MOJOX's 35.64% return.


HSAFX

1D
0.40%
1M
2.77%
6M
2.11%
YTD
2.00%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
2.88%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.95%

MOJOX

1D
1.62%
1M
-1.62%
6M
18.27%
YTD
35.64%
1Y
47.21%
3Y*
29.50%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HSAFX vs. MOJOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HSAFX
Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund
2.00%7.78%1.74%0.65%4.42%7.23%11.20%-0.37%
MOJOX
Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund
35.64%22.91%22.29%19.10%-22.78%28.86%-1.95%-1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HSAFX and MOJOX is -0.23, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2019

0.18

The correlation between HSAFX and MOJOX shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSAFX vs. MOJOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HSAFX
HSAFX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HSAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HSAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

MOJOX
MOJOX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
MOJOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOJOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOJOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MOJOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOJOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HSAFX vs. MOJOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) and Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSAFXMOJOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.37

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

4.84

-4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.90

18.71

-16.81

HSAFX vs. MOJOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSAFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the MOJOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSAFX and MOJOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSAFX vs. MOJOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSAFX drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, smaller than the maximum MOJOX drawdown of -28.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSAFX and MOJOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSAFXMOJOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-28.85%

+23.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.34%

-10.34%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.34%

-22.50%

+17.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.34%

-25.32%

+19.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-5.42%

+5.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-7.76%

+6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.67%

-0.46%

Volatility

HSAFX vs. MOJOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund (HSAFX) is 1.82%, while Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that HSAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOJOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSAFXMOJOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

8.06%

-6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

18.64%

-14.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.95%

22.39%

-16.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.99%

18.11%

-13.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.19%

16.41%

-11.22%

HSAFX vs. MOJOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSAFX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MOJOX's 2.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSAFX vs. MOJOX - Dividend Comparison

HSAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than MOJOX's 19.78% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSAFX
Hussman Strategic Allocation Fund
1.96%1.90%2.15%1.60%19.12%3.37%5.55%0.03%0.00%0.00%
MOJOX
Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund
19.78%26.83%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.49%5.78%4.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSAFX and MOJOX have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOJOX has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to HSAFX (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSAFX dropped -5.54% vs MOJOX's -28.85%.

MOJOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSAFX and MOJOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer