SFHIX vs. EIBLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SFHIX (Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund) and EIBLX (Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 10 years, SFHIX returned 26.06%/yr vs 4.68%/yr for EIBLX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SFHIX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for EIBLX.

Performance

SFHIX vs. EIBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) and Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFHIX achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than EIBLX's 0.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SFHIX has outperformed EIBLX with an annualized return of 26.06%, while EIBLX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.68% annualized return.

SFHIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 6M: 2.17%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: 7.51%
• 5Y*: 5.39%
• 10Y*: 26.06%

EIBLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 3.39%
• 3Y*: 6.88%
• 5Y*: 4.85%
• 10Y*: 4.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFHIX vs. EIBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SFHIX Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund	1.36%	5.70%	8.14%	11.50%	-0.95%	3.90%	1.77%	588.11%	0.53%	3.64%
EIBLX Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund	0.87%	3.90%	8.14%	12.29%	-2.34%	4.33%	2.38%	7.07%	0.81%	4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SFHIX and EIBLX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.53

The correlation between SFHIX and EIBLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SFHIX vs. EIBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFHIX

SFHIX Risk / Return Rank: 70
SFHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
SFHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SFHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
SFHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
SFHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

EIBLX

EIBLX Risk / Return Rank: 43
EIBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EIBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
EIBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EIBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
EIBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFHIX vs. EIBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) and Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SFHIX	EIBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	1.50	+1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.82	3.19	+1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.90	1.48	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	2.02	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.79	6.17	+1.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SFHIX vs. EIBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the EIBLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFHIX and EIBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SFHIX	EIBLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99	1.50	+1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.70	1.76	+0.94
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	1.33	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	1.27	-0.75

Drawdowns

SFHIX vs. EIBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFHIX drawdown since its inception was -19.94%, smaller than the maximum EIBLX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFHIX and EIBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFHIX	EIBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.94%	-32.53%	+12.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.25%	-1.68%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.25%	-2.72%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.57%	-6.27%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.94%	-18.70%	-1.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-1.65%	+0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	0.55%	+0.08%

Volatility

SFHIX vs. EIBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) is 0.46%, while Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX) has a volatility of 0.58%. This indicates that SFHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFHIX	EIBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.46%	0.58%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.43%	1.60%	-0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65%	2.26%	-0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.00%	2.77%	-0.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.69%	3.53%	+43.16%

SFHIX vs. EIBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFHIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than EIBLX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFHIX vs. EIBLX - Dividend Comparison

SFHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than EIBLX's 7.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIBLX Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund	7.03%	7.58%	8.29%	8.58%	5.02%	3.32%	3.68%	5.01%	4.46%	3.82%	4.14%	4.33%
SFHIX Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund	7.61%	7.61%	8.07%	8.06%	4.99%	3.20%	3.93%	142.83%	5.03%	4.00%	4.22%	4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFHIX and EIBLX in my portfolio?

SFHIX and EIBLX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFHIX or EIBLX?

EIBLX has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to SFHIX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFHIX dropped -19.94% vs EIBLX's -32.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.