SFHIX vs. DAFRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) and Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX).
SFHIX is managed by Shenkman Funds. It was launched on Oct 14, 2014. DAFRX is managed by Dunham Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2013.
Performance
SFHIX vs. DAFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SFHIX vs. DAFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFHIX Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund | -1.02% | 5.70% | 8.14% | 11.50% | -0.95% | 3.90% | 1.77% | 588.11% | 0.53% | 3.64% |
DAFRX Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund | -0.63% | 5.04% | 7.26% | 13.05% | -2.54% | 3.51% | -0.09% | 7.18% | -1.06% | 2.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFHIX achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than DAFRX's -0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SFHIX has outperformed DAFRX with an annualized return of 26.07%, while DAFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.87% annualized return.
SFHIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- 26.07%
DAFRX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- -0.25%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.77%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SFHIX vs. DAFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFHIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than DAFRX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SFHIX vs. DAFRX — Risk / Return Rank
SFHIX
DAFRX
SFHIX vs. DAFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) and Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFHIX | DAFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 1.70 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 2.35 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.43 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.52 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 6.37 | -0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFHIX | DAFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.70 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.59 | 2.15 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 1.15 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.04 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between SFHIX and DAFRX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SFHIX vs. DAFRX - Dividend Comparison
SFHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, more than DAFRX's 6.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFHIX Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund | 7.01% | 7.61% | 8.07% | 8.06% | 4.99% | 3.20% | 3.93% | 142.83% | 5.03% | 4.00% | 4.22% | 4.58% |
DAFRX Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund | 6.90% | 7.26% | 7.87% | 8.91% | 5.76% | 3.13% | 3.27% | 4.36% | 4.30% | 3.31% | 3.01% | 3.13% |
Drawdowns
SFHIX vs. DAFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFHIX drawdown since its inception was -19.94%, roughly equal to the maximum DAFRX drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFHIX and DAFRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFHIX | DAFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.94% | -19.42% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.25% | -2.35% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.57% | -7.08% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.94% | -19.42% | -0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.22% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -0.98% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.59% | +0.09% |
Volatility
SFHIX vs. DAFRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) is 0.70%, while Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX) has a volatility of 0.74%. This indicates that SFHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SFHIX | DAFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.70% | 0.74% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.34% | 1.39% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16% | 2.39% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 2.23% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.68% | 3.38% | +43.30% |