SFGV vs. IBID
SFGV (Sequoia Global Value ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFGV is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Sequoia, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. SFGV is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, SFGV returned 25.55% vs 4.04% for IBID. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SFGV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
SFGV vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFGV achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.99% return.
SFGV
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBID
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFGV vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF | 11.69% | 18.84% | 11.04% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 1.99% | 5.66% | 4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFGV and IBID is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024 | 0.04 |
The correlation between SFGV and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFGV vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
SFGV
IBID
SFGV vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFGV | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.75 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 8.22 | -5.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 30.99 | -19.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFGV vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFGV drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFGV and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFGV | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.51% | -1.28% | -13.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -0.49% | -7.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -0.49% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -0.22% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 0.13% | +2.10% |
Volatility
SFGV vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that SFGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFGV | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 0.35% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 0.86% | +8.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 1.23% | +10.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 2.24% | +11.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 2.24% | +11.02% |
SFGV vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFGV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFGV vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
SFGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 3.68% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% |
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF | 2.25% | 2.52% | 2.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFGV and IBID have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFGV has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFGV dropped -14.51% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, SFGV leads with 25.55% vs 4.04% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SFGV has performed better with a 25.55% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for SFGV.
IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.25% for SFGV.
SFGV is categorized as Global Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Sequoia and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SFGV and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFGV and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer