PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFD vs. FLGZY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SFD vs. FLGZY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Smithfield Foods, Inc (SFD) and Flughafen Zürich AG (FLGZY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFD achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than FLGZY's 3.60% return.


SFD

1D
1.79%
1M
-5.20%
YTD
14.47%
6M
13.45%
1Y
10.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLGZY

1D
0.00%
1M
5.65%
YTD
3.60%
6M
3.60%
1Y
17.61%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
13.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFD vs. FLGZY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc
14.47%10.98%
FLGZY
Flughafen Zürich AG
3.60%30.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SFD and FLGZY is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2025

-0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SFD:

$9.85B

FLGZY:

$9.44B

EPS

SFD:

$2.56

FLGZY:

CHF 0.88

PE Ratio

SFD:

9.77

FLGZY:

11.39

PEG Ratio

SFD:

0.01

FLGZY:

1.97

PS Ratio

SFD:

0.63

FLGZY:

2.85

PB Ratio

SFD:

1.44

FLGZY:

2.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

SFD:

$15.56B

FLGZY:

CHF 2.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SFD:

$2.09B

FLGZY:

CHF 1.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

SFD:

$1.57B

FLGZY:

CHF 1.49B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFD vs. FLGZY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFD
SFD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFD Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGZY
FLGZY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FLGZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGZY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGZY Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFD vs. FLGZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smithfield Foods, Inc (SFD) and Flughafen Zürich AG (FLGZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFDFLGZYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.33

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.07

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

2.71

-1.63

SFD vs. FLGZY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFD Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the FLGZY Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFD and FLGZY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFD vs. FLGZY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFD drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, smaller than the maximum FLGZY drawdown of -29.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFD and FLGZY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFDFLGZYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.43%

-29.38%

+10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-16.51%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.56%

-6.64%

-7.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-7.44%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.82%

6.52%

+3.30%

Volatility

SFD vs. FLGZY - Volatility Comparison

Smithfield Foods, Inc (SFD) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to Flughafen Zürich AG (FLGZY) at 7.48%. This indicates that SFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLGZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFDFLGZYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

7.48%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

19.18%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.73%

22.78%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.72%

28.02%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.72%

35.58%

-6.86%

Dividends

SFD vs. FLGZY - Dividend Comparison

SFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than FLGZY's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FLGZY
Flughafen Zürich AG
3.46%1.59%1.82%1.24%0.00%0.00%1.06%
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc
4.51%4.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SFD vs. FLGZY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smithfield Foods, Inc and Flughafen Zürich AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
3.80B
714.45M
(SFD) Total Revenue
(FLGZY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SFD values in USD, FLGZY values in CHF

SFD vs. FLGZY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Smithfield Foods, Inc and Flughafen Zürich AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
13.5%
40.4%
Portfolio components
SFD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smithfield Foods, Inc reported a gross profit of 511.00M and revenue of 3.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.5%.

FLGZY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flughafen Zürich AG reported a gross profit of 288.60M and revenue of 714.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.4%.

SFD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smithfield Foods, Inc reported an operating income of 333.00M and revenue of 3.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

FLGZY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flughafen Zürich AG reported an operating income of 266.38M and revenue of 714.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.3%.

SFD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smithfield Foods, Inc reported a net income of 245.00M and revenue of 3.80B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

FLGZY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flughafen Zürich AG reported a net income of 183.67M and revenue of 714.45M, resulting in a net margin of 25.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SFD and FLGZY have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFD has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to FLGZY (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFD dropped -18.43% vs FLGZY's -29.38%.

FLGZY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFD and FLGZY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer