PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFD vs. HRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SFD vs. HRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Smithfield Foods, Inc (SFD) and Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFD achieves a 17.81% return, which is significantly higher than HRL's 0.24% return.


SFD

1D
-0.39%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
17.81%
6M
21.01%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HRL

1D
-0.94%
1M
11.96%
YTD
0.24%
6M
2.10%
1Y
-21.28%
3Y*
-13.87%
5Y*
-11.23%
10Y*
-1.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFD vs. HRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc
17.81%18.29%
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
0.24%-19.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SFD and HRL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2025

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SFD:

$10.14B

HRL:

$12.74B

EPS

SFD:

$2.56

HRL:

$0.85

PE Ratio

SFD:

10.05

HRL:

27.28

PS Ratio

SFD:

0.65

HRL:

1.04

PB Ratio

SFD:

1.48

HRL:

1.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

SFD:

$15.56B

HRL:

$12.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SFD:

$2.09B

HRL:

$1.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

SFD:

$1.57B

HRL:

$868.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFD vs. HRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFD
SFD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

HRL
HRL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRL Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
HRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFD vs. HRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smithfield Foods, Inc (SFD) and Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFDHRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.88

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

-0.62

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.63

-0.98

+2.62

SFD vs. HRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFD Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the HRL Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFD and HRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFDHRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

-0.72

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.37

+0.63

Drawdowns

SFD vs. HRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFD drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, smaller than the maximum HRL drawdown of -58.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFD and HRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFDHRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.43%

-58.46%

+40.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-34.29%

+15.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.06%

-51.33%

+39.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-11.85%

+4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.48%

21.65%

-12.17%

Volatility

SFD vs. HRL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Smithfield Foods, Inc (SFD) is 5.39%, while Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that SFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFDHRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

13.25%

-7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.52%

21.03%

-3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.08%

29.49%

-5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.15%

24.07%

+4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.15%

23.32%

+4.83%

Dividends

SFD vs. HRL - Dividend Comparison

SFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than HRL's 5.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
5.04%4.89%3.60%3.43%2.28%2.01%2.00%1.86%1.76%1.87%1.67%1.26%
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc
4.38%4.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SFD vs. HRL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smithfield Foods, Inc and Hormel Foods Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
3.80B
2.97B
(SFD) Total Revenue
(HRL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SFD vs. HRL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Smithfield Foods, Inc and Hormel Foods Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
13.5%
17.4%
Portfolio components
SFD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smithfield Foods, Inc reported a gross profit of 511.00M and revenue of 3.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.5%.

HRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 518.51M and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.

SFD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smithfield Foods, Inc reported an operating income of 333.00M and revenue of 3.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

HRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 217.11M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

SFD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smithfield Foods, Inc reported a net income of 245.00M and revenue of 3.80B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

HRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hormel Foods Corporation reported a net income of 157.50M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SFD and HRL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRL has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to SFD (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFD dropped -18.43% vs HRL's -58.46%.

SFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFD and HRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer