SEZL vs. SPMO
SEZL (Sezzle Inc. Common Stock) is a stock, while SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Over the past year, SEZL returned -0.76% vs 46.00% for SPMO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SEZL vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEZL achieves a 78.32% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 30.35% return.
SEZL
- 1D
- -4.42%
- 1M
- 31.68%
- YTD
- 78.32%
- 6M
- 75.65%
- 1Y
- -0.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
SEZL vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock | 78.32% | 48.89% | 1,146.59% | -74.69% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 14.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEZL and SPMO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEZL vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
SEZL
SPMO
SEZL vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEZL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.47 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 3.64 | -3.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 14.17 | -14.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEZL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 2.62 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.01 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
SEZL vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEZL drawdown since its inception was -89.95%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEZL and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEZL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.95% | -30.95% | -59.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.02% | -12.70% | -59.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.86% | 0.00% | -37.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -4.60% | -35.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.34% | 3.26% | +50.08% |
Volatility
SEZL vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) has a higher volatility of 21.11% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 7.35%. This indicates that SEZL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEZL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.11% | 7.35% | +13.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.86% | 14.39% | +47.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.75% | 17.64% | +70.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 135.88% | 19.30% | +116.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 135.88% | 20.31% | +115.57% |
Dividends
SEZL vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
SEZL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEZL and SPMO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEZL has higher volatility (21.11%) compared to SPMO (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEZL dropped -89.95% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEZL and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer