SEZL vs. ASM
SEZL (Sezzle Inc. Common Stock) and ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) are both stocks. SEZL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while ASM operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past year, SEZL returned -8.27% vs 67.51% for ASM. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SEZL vs. ASM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEZL achieves a 90.88% return, which is significantly higher than ASM's -3.70% return.
SEZL
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- 25.76%
- YTD
- 90.88%
- 6M
- 78.97%
- 1Y
- -8.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASM
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -13.33%
- YTD
- -3.70%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 67.51%
- 3Y*
- 103.46%
- 5Y*
- 35.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
SEZL vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock | 90.88% | 48.89% | 1,146.59% | -74.69% |
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | -3.70% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -16.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEZL and ASM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
SEZL:
$4.23B
ASM:
$1.04B
SEZL:
$4.15
ASM:
$0.23
SEZL:
29.22
ASM:
26.32
SEZL:
0.05
ASM:
0.08
SEZL:
9.01
ASM:
8.77
SEZL:
21.51
ASM:
3.76
SEZL:
$480.91M
ASM:
$110.70M
SEZL:
$426.79M
ASM:
$59.09M
SEZL:
$193.18M
ASM:
$55.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEZL vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank
SEZL
ASM
SEZL vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEZL | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.19 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 1.29 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 2.84 | -3.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEZL | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 0.84 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.09 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
SEZL vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEZL drawdown since its inception was -89.95%, roughly equal to the maximum ASM drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEZL and ASM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEZL | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.95% | -94.10% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.02% | -52.40% | -19.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -52.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -68.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.49% | -46.80% | +13.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.41% | -63.78% | +23.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.47% | 23.83% | +29.64% |
Volatility
SEZL vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) is 17.75%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 26.02%. This indicates that SEZL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEZL | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.75% | 26.02% | -8.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.00% | 64.37% | -2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.94% | 81.35% | +6.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 135.69% | 65.82% | +69.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 135.69% | 69.71% | +65.98% |
Dividends
SEZL vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison
Neither SEZL nor ASM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SEZL vs. ASM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sezzle Inc. Common Stock and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SEZL vs. ASM - Profitability Comparison
SEZL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 117.02M and revenue of 135.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.
ASM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 25.51M and revenue of 41.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
SEZL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.
ASM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 21.76M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.
SEZL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.
ASM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 15.69M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SEZL and ASM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASM has higher volatility (26.02%) compared to SEZL (17.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEZL dropped -89.95% vs ASM's -94.10%.
ASM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEZL and ASM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer