SEZL vs. AGI
SEZL (Sezzle Inc. Common Stock) and AGI (Alamos Gold Inc.) are both stocks. SEZL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while AGI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past year, SEZL returned -0.06% vs 14.93% for AGI. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SEZL vs. AGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEZL achieves a 143.80% return, which is significantly higher than AGI's -27.72% return.
SEZL
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -11.66%
- 6M
- 144.70%
- YTD
- 143.80%
- 1Y
- -0.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 251.49%
AGI
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- 6M
- -24.43%
- YTD
- -27.72%
- 1Y
- 14.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.49%
- 5Y*
- 28.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $133.64M | $126.71M | $144.32M | |
| $71.68M | $100.82M | $92.07M |
SEZL vs. AGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock | 143.80% | 48.89% | 1,146.59% | -9.40% |
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | -27.72% | 109.93% | 37.72% | 19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEZL and AGI is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2023 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
SEZL:
$5.20B
AGI:
$11.69B
SEZL:
$4.16
AGI:
$2.76
SEZL:
37.17
AGI:
10.07
SEZL:
0.07
AGI:
0.07
SEZL:
11.46
AGI:
5.32
SEZL:
27.48
AGI:
2.44
SEZL:
$480.91M
AGI:
$2.21B
SEZL:
$426.79M
AGI:
$1.33B
SEZL:
$193.18M
AGI:
$1.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEZL vs. AGI — Risk / Return Rank
SEZL
AGI
SEZL vs. AGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEZL | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.09 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 0.30 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.00 | 0.70 | -0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEZL vs. AGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEZL drawdown since its inception was -89.95%, roughly equal to the maximum AGI drawdown of -88.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEZL and AGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEZL | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.95% | -88.13% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.53% | -49.60% | -17.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.93% | -49.60% | +31.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.95% | -37.77% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.40% | 21.26% | +26.14% |
Volatility
SEZL vs. AGI - Volatility Comparison
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) has a higher volatility of 24.29% compared to Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) at 11.71%. This indicates that SEZL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEZL | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.29% | 11.71% | +12.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.32% | 44.49% | +20.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.01% | 54.01% | +33.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.71% | 41.86% | +158.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.71% | 48.43% | +152.28% |
Dividends
SEZL vs. AGI - Dividend Comparison
SEZL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.47% | 0.26% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.56% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 1.22% |
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SEZL vs. AGI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sezzle Inc. Common Stock and Alamos Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SEZL vs. AGI - Profitability Comparison
SEZL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 117.02M and revenue of 135.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.
AGI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 342.96M and revenue of 579.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.
SEZL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.
AGI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 345.99M and revenue of 579.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.8%.
SEZL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.
AGI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 263.53M and revenue of 579.01M, resulting in a net margin of 45.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SEZL and AGI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEZL has higher volatility (24.29%) compared to AGI (11.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEZL dropped -89.95% vs AGI's -88.13%.
AGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEZL and AGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer