SEUC.L vs. SPYL.L
SEUC.L (SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and SPYL.L (SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SEUC.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while SPYL.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SEUC.L returned 1.91% vs 25.73% for SPYL.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEUC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPYL.L.
Performance
SEUC.L vs. SPYL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SEUC.L is traded in EUR, while SPYL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEUC.L achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPYL.L's 11.61% return.
SEUC.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 1.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- 0.86%
SPYL.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 11.61%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEUC.L vs. SPYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SEUC.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.55% | 3.03% | 4.21% | 1.84% |
SPYL.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc | 11.61% | 3.46% | 33.60% | 9.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEUC.L and SPYL.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SEUC.L and SPYL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SEUC.L vs. SPYL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Financial Services
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
Industrials
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
Consumer Cyclical
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
Consumer Defensive
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
Healthcare
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
Real Estate
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
Communication Services
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
Utilities
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
Basic Materials
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
Energy
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
Technology
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEUC.L vs. SPYL.L — Risk / Return Rank
SEUC.L
SPYL.L
SEUC.L vs. SPYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEUC.L | SPYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.58 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 12.35 | -3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEUC.L | SPYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 2.05 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.47 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
SEUC.L vs. SPYL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEUC.L drawdown since its inception was -7.82%, smaller than the maximum SPYL.L drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEUC.L and SPYL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEUC.L | SPYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.82% | -22.59% | +14.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.83% | -7.07% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.38% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -3.36% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | 2.06% | -1.85% |
Volatility
SEUC.L vs. SPYL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L) is 0.36%, while SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that SEUC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEUC.L | SPYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 3.04% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.95% | 8.64% | -7.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08% | 12.31% | -11.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 15.07% | -13.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.15% | 15.07% | -12.92% |
SEUC.L vs. SPYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEUC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SEUC.L vs. SPYL.L - Dividend Comparison
SEUC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, while SPYL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEUC.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 2.96% | 3.05% | 2.59% | 1.27% | 0.19% | 0.30% | 0.23% | 0.17% | 0.11% | 0.28% | 0.50% | 0.72% |
SPYL.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEUC.L and SPYL.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYL.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYL.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SEUC.L.
SEUC.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while SPYL.L is S&P 500. SEUC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while SPYL.L tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SEUC.L and 0.03% for SPYL.L.
Find the right allocation for SEUC.L and SPYL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer