SEUC.L vs. IEAC.AS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L) and iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS).

SEUC.L and IEAC.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SEUC.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR. It was launched on Aug 27, 2013. IEAC.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Mar 6, 2009. Both SEUC.L and IEAC.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SEUC.L vs. IEAC.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L) and iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SEUC.L vs. IEAC.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SEUC.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF	-0.17%	3.03%	4.21%	4.17%	-3.54%	-0.27%	0.22%	0.79%	-0.53%	0.06%
IEAC.AS iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF	-0.57%	3.05%	4.40%	7.74%	-13.63%	-1.02%	2.55%	6.29%	-1.52%	2.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEUC.L achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly higher than IEAC.AS's -0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SEUC.L has underperformed IEAC.AS with an annualized return of 0.81%, while IEAC.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 0.98% annualized return.

SEUC.L

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: -0.17%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 2.09%
• 3Y*: 3.52%
• 5Y*: 1.43%
• 10Y*: 0.81%

IEAC.AS

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -1.43%
• YTD: -0.57%
• 6M: -0.34%
• 1Y: 2.31%
• 3Y*: 4.30%
• 5Y*: -0.22%
• 10Y*: 0.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEUC.L vs. IEAC.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SEUC.L and IEAC.AS have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

SEUC.L

SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF

IEAC.AS

iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

SEUC.L vs. IEAC.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEUC.L

SEUC.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
SEUC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SEUC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SEUC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SEUC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SEUC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

IEAC.AS

IEAC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 40
IEAC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IEAC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IEAC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 36
IEAC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IEAC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEUC.L vs. IEAC.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L) and iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEUC.L	IEAC.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	0.84	+1.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	1.19	+1.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.16	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	1.02	+1.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.01	4.58	+6.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEUC.L vs. IEAC.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEUC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the IEAC.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEUC.L and IEAC.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEUC.L	IEAC.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	0.84	+1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.09	-0.05	+1.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.22	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.77	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between SEUC.L and IEAC.AS is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SEUC.L vs. IEAC.AS - Dividend Comparison

SEUC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than IEAC.AS's 3.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SEUC.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF	2.98%	3.05%	2.59%	1.27%	0.19%	0.30%	0.23%	0.17%	0.11%	0.28%	0.50%	0.72%
IEAC.AS iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF	3.37%	3.29%	3.39%	2.51%	0.84%	0.81%	0.84%	1.10%	0.98%	1.52%	1.66%	0.90%

Drawdowns

SEUC.L vs. IEAC.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEUC.L drawdown since its inception was -7.82%, smaller than the maximum IEAC.AS drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEUC.L and IEAC.AS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEUC.L	IEAC.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.82%	-17.26%	+9.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.83%	-2.65%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.90%	-17.26%	+12.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-7.82%	-17.26%	+9.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-2.13%	+1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.65%	-2.74%	+2.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	0.59%	-0.41%

Volatility

SEUC.L vs. IEAC.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L) is 0.52%, while iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that SEUC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEAC.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEUC.L	IEAC.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.52%	1.50%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.64%	1.90%	-1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98%	2.71%	-1.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.32%	4.34%	-3.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.13%	4.30%	-2.17%