SETM vs. XLBI
SETM (Sprott Critical Materials ETF) and XLBI (State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SETM is a Materials fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index, while XLBI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. SETM is passively managed, while XLBI is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SETM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLBI.
Performance
SETM vs. XLBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SETM achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than XLBI's 6.83% return.
SETM
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- -14.31%
- 6M
- -14.39%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 59.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLBI
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETM vs. XLBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF | 1.35% | 51.91% |
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.83% | 2.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SETM and XLBI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.56 |
SETM vs. XLBI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SETM
XLBI
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SETM
XLBI
-
Energy
SETM
XLBI
-
Industrials
SETM
XLBI
-
Technology
SETM
XLBI
-
Consumer Defensive
SETM
XLBI
-
Communication Services
SETM
-
XLBI
-
Consumer Cyclical
SETM
-
XLBI
-
Financial Services
SETM
-
XLBI
Healthcare
SETM
-
XLBI
-
Real Estate
SETM
-
XLBI
-
Utilities
SETM
-
XLBI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SETM vs. XLBI — Risk / Return Rank
SETM
XLBI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SETM vs. XLBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) and State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SETM | XLBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SETM vs. XLBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SETM drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than XLBI's maximum drawdown of -10.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETM and XLBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SETM | XLBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -10.62% | -32.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.15% | -2.76% | -23.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.15% | -2.10% | -13.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.43% | — | — |
Volatility
SETM vs. XLBI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SETM | XLBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.50% | 13.94% | +32.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.17% | 13.94% | +23.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.17% | 13.94% | +23.23% |
SETM vs. XLBI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SETM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLBI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SETM vs. XLBI - Dividend Comparison
SETM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than XLBI's 14.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF | 1.54% | 1.56% | 2.07% | 2.47% |
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.97% | 7.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SETM and XLBI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SETM.
XLBI has the higher dividend yield at 14.97%, compared with 1.54% for SETM.
SETM is categorized as Materials, while XLBI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SETM and 0.35% for XLBI.
Find the right allocation for SETM and XLBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer