SETM vs. GREK
SETM (Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF) and GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SETM is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross, while GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SETM returned 25.24%/yr vs 31.41%/yr for GREK. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SETM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for GREK.
Performance
SETM vs. GREK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SETM achieves a 13.02% return, which is significantly higher than GREK's 10.53% return.
SETM
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -13.85%
- YTD
- 13.02%
- 6M
- 17.73%
- 1Y
- 103.30%
- 3Y*
- 25.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GREK
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 11.07%
- 1Y
- 36.15%
- 3Y*
- 31.41%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.76%
SETM vs. GREK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 13.02% | 95.27% | -13.24% | -11.03% |
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 10.53% | 76.11% | 9.53% | 24.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SETM and GREK is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.41 |
SETM vs. GREK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SETM
GREK
Basic Materials
Energy
Industrials
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SETM
GREK
Energy
SETM
GREK
Industrials
SETM
GREK
Technology
SETM
GREK
-
Consumer Defensive
SETM
GREK
Communication Services
SETM
-
GREK
Consumer Cyclical
SETM
-
GREK
Financial Services
SETM
-
GREK
Healthcare
SETM
-
GREK
-
Real Estate
SETM
-
GREK
Utilities
SETM
-
GREK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SETM vs. GREK — Risk / Return Rank
SETM
GREK
SETM vs. GREK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SETM | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.27 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 1.70 | +2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.22 | 5.27 | +6.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SETM | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.51 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.16 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
SETM vs. GREK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SETM drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum GREK drawdown of -79.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETM and GREK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SETM | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -79.50% | +36.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.85% | -21.32% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.81% | -22.63% | -20.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.64% | -5.63% | -12.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -45.30% | +31.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.48% | 6.88% | +1.60% |
Volatility
SETM vs. GREK - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) has a higher volatility of 15.93% compared to Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) at 8.07%. This indicates that SETM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GREK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SETM | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.93% | 8.07% | +7.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.23% | 20.47% | +15.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.85% | 24.14% | +21.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.95% | 24.41% | +12.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.95% | 29.84% | +7.11% |
SETM vs. GREK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SETM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GREK's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SETM vs. GREK - Dividend Comparison
SETM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than GREK's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 3.13% | 3.46% | 4.63% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.13% | 1.95% | 1.52% |
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 1.38% | 1.56% | 2.07% | 2.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SETM and GREK have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SETM has higher volatility (15.93%) compared to GREK (8.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SETM dropped -42.81% vs GREK's -79.50%.
On 3-year performance, GREK leads with 31.41% vs 25.24% for SETM. On fees, GREK is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, GREK has been the lower-risk option at 8.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GREK has performed better with a 31.41% return vs 25.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GREK is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SETM.
GREK has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.38% for SETM.
SETM is categorized as Energy Equities, while GREK is Emerging Markets Equities. SETM tracks Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross, while GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SETM and 0.58% for GREK.
SETM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SETM and GREK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer