PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SETAX vs. PRRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SETAX vs. PRRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Real Estate Fund (SETAX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SETAX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than PRRSX's 12.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SETAX having a 6.41% annualized return and PRRSX not far ahead at 6.58%.


SETAX

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
10.26%
6M
9.68%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
11.80%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
6.41%

PRRSX

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
12.29%
6M
10.24%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
6.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SETAX vs. PRRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SETAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Real Estate Fund
10.26%1.90%10.63%15.75%-25.85%44.05%-3.51%25.14%-5.87%5.17%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
12.29%5.21%5.11%12.30%-29.37%53.74%-3.80%29.61%-6.42%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SETAX and PRRSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2004

0.95

The correlation between SETAX and PRRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SETAX vs. PRRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SETAX
SETAX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SETAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SETAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SETAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SETAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SETAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PRRSX
PRRSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PRRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SETAX vs. PRRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Real Estate Fund (SETAX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SETAXPRRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.73

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.29

5.95

-1.66

SETAX vs. PRRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SETAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the PRRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SETAX and PRRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SETAXPRRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.10

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.19

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.30

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.35

-0.06

Drawdowns

SETAX vs. PRRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SETAX drawdown since its inception was -75.06%, roughly equal to the maximum PRRSX drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETAX and PRRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SETAXPRRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.06%

-77.82%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-9.05%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.95%

-17.77%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.26%

-37.14%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.32%

-45.75%

+4.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-3.11%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.94%

-13.09%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.62%

-0.04%

Volatility

SETAX vs. PRRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Real Estate Fund (SETAX) is 3.83%, while PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that SETAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SETAXPRRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

4.33%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.37%

10.18%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.95%

14.26%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

20.20%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.12%

21.87%

-0.75%

SETAX vs. PRRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SETAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than PRRSX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

SETAX vs. PRRSX - Dividend Comparison

SETAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.76%, more than PRRSX's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
0.79%2.19%0.61%0.00%18.62%34.01%7.21%7.99%0.81%1.67%0.66%8.38%
SETAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Real Estate Fund
10.76%11.86%5.19%2.10%5.36%6.86%6.34%8.59%17.07%8.65%13.65%5.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SETAX and PRRSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRRSX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to SETAX (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SETAX dropped -75.06% vs PRRSX's -77.82%.

PRRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SETAX and PRRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer