SES vs. ASST

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SES (SES AI Corp) and ASST (Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock) are both stocks. SES operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while ASST operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, SES returned -20.00%/yr vs -56.18%/yr for ASST. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SES vs. ASST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SES AI Corp (SES) and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SES achieves a -40.56% return, which is significantly lower than ASST's 2.64% return.

SES

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.31%
• YTD: -40.56%
• 6M: -47.55%
• 1Y: 11.83%
• 3Y*: -20.00%
• 5Y*: -36.15%
• 10Y*: —

ASST

• 1D: 3.91%
• 1M: -9.77%
• YTD: 2.64%
• 6M: -12.25%
• 1Y: -86.92%
• 3Y*: -56.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SES vs. ASST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SES SES AI Corp	-40.56%	-17.81%	19.67%	-45.21%
ASST Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock	2.64%	50.46%	-84.65%	-89.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SES and ASST is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023	0.08

The correlation between SES and ASST shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap SES : $356.14M ASST : $933.69M
EPS SES : -$0.22 ASST : -$25.54
PS Ratio SES : 16.19 ASST : 71.38
Total Revenue (TTM) SES : $21.92M ASST : $5.73M
Gross Profit (TTM) SES : $7.97M ASST : -$7.43M
EBITDA (TTM) SES : -$68.11M ASST : -$304.63M

Return for Risk

SES vs. ASST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SES

SES Risk / Return Rank: 48
SES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SES Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SES Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SES Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SES Martin Ratio Rank: 44

ASST

ASST Risk / Return Rank: 15
ASST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
ASST Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
ASST Omega Ratio Rank: 17
ASST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
ASST Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SES vs. ASST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SES AI Corp (SES) and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SES	ASST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	-0.54	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	-0.86	+1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.91	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	-0.92	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.17	-1.12	+1.29

SES vs. ASST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SES Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the ASST Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SES and ASST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SES vs. ASST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SES drawdown since its inception was -97.58%, roughly equal to the maximum ASST drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SES and ASST.

Drawdown Indicators

	SES	ASST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.58%	-98.78%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.08%	-95.98%	+21.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-91.41%	-97.25%	+5.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.39%	-97.42%	+7.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.76%	-90.39%	+24.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.30%	78.47%	-33.17%

Volatility

SES vs. ASST - Volatility Comparison

SES AI Corp (SES) has a higher volatility of 27.05% compared to Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST) at 23.80%. This indicates that SES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SES	ASST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.05%	23.80%	+3.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.68%	81.69%	-5.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	106.91%	162.68%	-55.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	114.53%	322.54%	-208.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	111.41%	322.54%	-211.13%

Dividends

SES vs. ASST - Dividend Comparison

Neither SES nor ASST has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SES and ASST in my portfolio?

SES and ASST have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SES or ASST?

SES has higher volatility (27.05%) compared to ASST (23.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SES dropped -97.58% vs ASST's -98.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.