SES vs. KULR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SES (SES AI Corp) and KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) are both stocks. SES operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while KULR operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, SES returned -36.67%/yr vs -28.26%/yr for KULR. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SES vs. KULR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SES AI Corp (SES) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SES achieves a -43.33% return, which is significantly lower than KULR's 30.41% return.

SES

• 1D: -2.86%
• 1M: -16.39%
• YTD: -43.33%
• 6M: -49.00%
• 1Y: 22.18%
• 3Y*: -19.97%
• 5Y*: -36.67%
• 10Y*: —

KULR

• 1D: -3.26%
• 1M: -16.27%
• YTD: 30.41%
• 6M: 8.43%
• 1Y: -42.30%
• 3Y*: -9.34%
• 5Y*: -28.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SES vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SES SES AI Corp	-43.33%	-17.81%	19.67%	-41.90%	-68.34%	-5.24%
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	30.41%	-89.58%	1,818.92%	-84.58%	-56.52%	6.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SES and KULR is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2021	0.25

Over the past year, SES and KULR have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap SES : $339.50M KULR : $153.35M
EPS SES : -$0.22 KULR : -$1.57
PS Ratio SES : 15.44 KULR : 9.43
PB Ratio SES : 1.67 KULR : 1.26
Total Revenue (TTM) SES : $21.92M KULR : $16.17M
Gross Profit (TTM) SES : $7.97M KULR : $770.97K
EBITDA (TTM) SES : -$68.11M KULR : -$60.59M

Return for Risk

SES vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SES

SES Risk / Return Rank: 52
SES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SES Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SES Omega Ratio Rank: 57
SES Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SES Martin Ratio Rank: 48

KULR

KULR Risk / Return Rank: 26
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 31
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SES vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SES AI Corp (SES) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SES	KULR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	-0.41	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	-0.05	+1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.99	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	-0.59	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.48	-0.88	+1.36

SES vs. KULR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SES Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the KULR Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SES and KULR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SES vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SES drawdown since its inception was -97.58%, roughly equal to the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SES and KULR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SES	KULR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.58%	-97.23%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.08%	-71.67%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-91.41%	-94.74%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.58%	-96.86%	-0.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.84%	-89.95%	-0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.87%	-66.32%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.50%	48.07%	-1.57%

Volatility

SES vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SES AI Corp (SES) is 25.20%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 39.36%. This indicates that SES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SES	KULR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.20%	39.36%	-14.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.33%	77.16%	-0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	106.97%	102.84%	+4.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	114.74%	126.17%	-11.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	111.27%	127.02%	-15.75%

Dividends

SES vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison

Neither SES nor KULR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SES and KULR in my portfolio?

SES and KULR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SES or KULR?

KULR has higher volatility (39.36%) compared to SES (25.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SES dropped -97.58% vs KULR's -97.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.