SEQUX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sequoia Fund (SEQUX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
SEQUX is managed by Sequoia. It was launched on Jul 15, 1970. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
SEQUX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEQUX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEQUX Sequoia Fund | -11.04% | 22.01% | 20.77% | 27.83% | -30.61% | 25.35% | 23.54% | 29.18% | -3.09% | -0.89% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.81% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEQUX achieves a -11.04% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -9.81% return.
SEQUX
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -8.69%
- YTD
- -11.04%
- 6M
- -11.20%
- 1Y
- 3.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEQUX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEQUX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SEQUX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
SEQUX
SWLGX
SEQUX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sequoia Fund (SEQUX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEQUX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 0.83 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.45 | 1.35 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.19 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 1.17 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.71 | 4.02 | -3.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEQUX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 0.83 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.58 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.70 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEQUX and SWLGX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SEQUX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
SEQUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.92%, more than SWLGX's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEQUX Sequoia Fund | 10.92% | 9.72% | 4.97% | 0.00% | 3.09% | 14.82% | 13.50% | 8.14% | 25.71% | 13.72% | 18.84% | 5.07% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SEQUX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEQUX drawdown since its inception was -45.81%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEQUX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEQUX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.81% | -32.69% | -13.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.62% | -16.16% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.07% | -32.69% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.59% | -13.03% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -7.13% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.48% | 4.69% | -0.21% |
Volatility
SEQUX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sequoia Fund (SEQUX) is 5.31%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that SEQUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEQUX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 6.73% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 12.40% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.36% | 22.57% | -6.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 21.52% | -3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 22.81% | -4.94% |