PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEQAX vs. VMNVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEQAX vs. VMNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund (SEQAX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Admiral Shares (VMNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEQAX achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than VMNVX's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SEQAX has outperformed VMNVX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while VMNVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.74% annualized return.


SEQAX

1D
1.17%
1M
4.97%
YTD
11.69%
6M
13.11%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
9.57%

VMNVX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.49%
YTD
8.44%
6M
8.97%
1Y
13.19%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
8.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEQAX vs. VMNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEQAX
Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund
11.69%22.37%5.57%12.10%-9.30%21.30%6.14%21.02%-8.68%14.70%
VMNVX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Admiral Shares
8.44%12.83%13.42%7.94%-4.46%15.40%-3.94%22.66%-1.70%16.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SEQAX and VMNVX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2013

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between SEQAX and VMNVX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEQAX vs. VMNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEQAX
SEQAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SEQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SEQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VMNVX
VMNVX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VMNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VMNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEQAX vs. VMNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund (SEQAX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Admiral Shares (VMNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEQAXVMNVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.34

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

2.10

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.73

8.20

+6.54

SEQAX vs. VMNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the VMNVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEQAX and VMNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEQAXVMNVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

1.92

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.98

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.73

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.80

-0.31

Drawdowns

SEQAX vs. VMNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEQAX drawdown since its inception was -52.69%, which is greater than VMNVX's maximum drawdown of -33.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEQAX and VMNVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEQAXVMNVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.69%

-33.11%

-19.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-6.24%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-7.93%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.03%

-12.93%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.29%

-33.11%

-2.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.18%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-2.81%

-8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.60%

+0.49%

Volatility

SEQAX vs. VMNVX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund (SEQAX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Admiral Shares (VMNVX) at 1.95%. This indicates that SEQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEQAXVMNVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

1.95%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

5.17%

+3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

6.83%

+4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

9.53%

+3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

11.96%

+2.96%

SEQAX vs. VMNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEQAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VMNVX's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEQAX vs. VMNVX - Dividend Comparison

SEQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.20%, more than VMNVX's 9.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEQAX
Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund
13.20%14.91%1.34%1.82%2.16%29.17%1.69%2.45%3.24%2.18%2.32%2.28%
VMNVX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Admiral Shares
9.28%10.07%3.84%3.13%5.03%6.33%2.15%4.62%7.37%2.31%2.82%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEQAX and VMNVX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEQAX has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to VMNVX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEQAX dropped -52.69% vs VMNVX's -33.11%.

SEQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEQAX and VMNVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer