PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEQAX vs. SECUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEQAX vs. SECUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund (SEQAX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEQAX achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than SECUX's 16.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SEQAX has underperformed SECUX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while SECUX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.33% annualized return.


SEQAX

1D
1.17%
1M
4.97%
YTD
11.69%
6M
13.11%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
9.57%

SECUX

1D
1.03%
1M
5.29%
YTD
16.16%
6M
16.31%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
11.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEQAX vs. SECUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEQAX
Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund
11.69%22.37%5.57%12.10%-9.30%21.30%6.14%21.02%-8.68%14.70%
SECUX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund
16.16%1.86%14.29%26.43%-28.33%13.39%31.95%32.44%-7.76%24.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SEQAX and SECUX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1994

0.76

The correlation between SEQAX and SECUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.81 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEQAX vs. SECUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEQAX
SEQAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SEQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SEQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SECUX
SECUX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SECUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SECUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEQAX vs. SECUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund (SEQAX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEQAXSECUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.22

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

2.12

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.73

7.20

+7.53

SEQAX vs. SECUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the SECUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEQAX and SECUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEQAXSECUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

1.23

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.28

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.54

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.27

+0.22

Drawdowns

SEQAX vs. SECUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEQAX drawdown since its inception was -52.69%, smaller than the maximum SECUX drawdown of -71.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEQAX and SECUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEQAXSECUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.69%

-71.68%

+18.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-9.17%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-25.43%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.03%

-37.80%

+17.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.29%

-38.56%

+3.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-18.41%

+7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.70%

-0.61%

Volatility

SEQAX vs. SECUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund (SEQAX) is 3.03%, while Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that SEQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SECUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEQAXSECUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

4.42%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

12.56%

-4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

15.83%

-4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

21.43%

-7.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

21.19%

-6.27%

SEQAX vs. SECUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEQAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SECUX's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEQAX vs. SECUX - Dividend Comparison

SEQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.20%, while SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SECUX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.31%41.48%6.54%14.34%2.18%27.68%12.89%0.59%14.34%
SEQAX
Guggenheim World Equity Income Fund
13.20%14.91%1.34%1.82%2.16%29.17%1.69%2.45%3.24%2.18%2.32%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEQAX and SECUX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SECUX has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to SEQAX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEQAX dropped -52.69% vs SECUX's -71.68%.

SEQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEQAX and SECUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer