SEPT vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SEPT (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - SEPT is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. SEPT is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, SEPT returned 19.52% vs 91.89% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. SEPT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

SEPT vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEPT achieves a 6.29% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.

SEPT

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 6.29%
• 6M: 6.89%
• 1Y: 19.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEPT vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SEPT AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF	6.29%	14.95%	16.43%	4.86%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	-5.44%	9.67%	-10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SEPT and BNO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2023	-0.06

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SEPT and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.06 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

SEPT vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPT

SEPT Risk / Return Rank: 82
SEPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SEPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SEPT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
SEPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SEPT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPT vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEPT	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	2.23	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	2.73	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.38	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	5.17	-1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.48	9.76	+8.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEPT vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPT and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEPT	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	2.23	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.60	0.14	+1.46

Drawdowns

SEPT vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPT drawdown since its inception was -12.83%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPT and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEPT	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.83%	-87.06%	+74.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.39%	-17.87%	+12.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-10.29%	+10.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.09%	-40.17%	+39.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	9.45%	-8.39%

Volatility

SEPT vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) is 1.12%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that SEPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEPT	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	14.22%	-13.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.61%	36.10%	-30.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.49%	41.46%	-33.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.87%	35.38%	-25.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.87%	36.68%	-26.81%

SEPT vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEPT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEPT vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEPT nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEPT and BNO in my portfolio?

SEPT and BNO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEPT or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to SEPT (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEPT dropped -12.83% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, SEPT or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 91.89% vs 19.52% for SEPT. On fees, SEPT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SEPT has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEPT or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 91.89% return vs 19.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEPT or BNO?

SEPT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEPT or BNO?

SEPT and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SEPT and BNO?

SEPT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SEPT and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.