PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEPT vs. ARLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEPT vs. ARLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SEPT having a 6.29% return and ARLU slightly higher at 6.41%.


SEPT

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.40%
YTD
6.29%
6M
6.89%
1Y
19.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARLU

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.52%
YTD
6.41%
6M
6.03%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEPT vs. ARLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEPT
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF
6.29%14.95%9.04%
ARLU
Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF
6.41%11.27%9.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SEPT and ARLU is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.95

The correlation between SEPT and ARLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEPT vs. ARLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPT
SEPT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SEPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLU
ARLU Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ARLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLU Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLU Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPT vs. ARLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEPTARLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.32

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

2.01

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.48

9.00

+9.48

SEPT vs. ARLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the ARLU Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPT and ARLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEPTARLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

1.75

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

1.00

+0.60

Drawdowns

SEPT vs. ARLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPT drawdown since its inception was -12.83%, smaller than the maximum ARLU drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPT and ARLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEPTARLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-15.38%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

-9.66%

+4.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.53%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-2.23%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

2.15%

-1.09%

Volatility

SEPT vs. ARLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF (SEPT) is 1.12%, while Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that SEPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEPTARLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

2.63%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.61%

8.73%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.49%

11.13%

-3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.87%

12.56%

-2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.87%

12.56%

-2.69%

SEPT vs. ARLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SEPT and ARLU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

SEPT vs. ARLU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEPT nor ARLU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SEPT and ARLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ARLU has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to SEPT (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEPT dropped -12.83% vs ARLU's -15.38%.

On 1-year performance, SEPT leads with 19.52% vs 19.35% for ARLU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, SEPT has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEPT has performed better with a 19.52% return vs 19.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEPT and ARLU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

SEPT and ARLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SEPT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ARLU is Options Trading.

SEPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEPT and ARLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer