PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEPP vs. PTRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEPP vs. PTRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September (SEPP) and PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEPP achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly higher than PTRB's 0.34% return.


SEPP

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.01%
YTD
5.73%
6M
6.43%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PTRB

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.41%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEPP vs. PTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEPP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September
5.73%14.06%6.79%
PTRB
PGIM Total Return Bond ETF
0.34%7.63%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SEPP and PTRB is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2024

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEPP vs. PTRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEPP
SEPP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SEPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPP Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PTRB
PTRB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEPP vs. PTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September (SEPP) and PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEPPPTRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.26

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

2.01

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.63

6.00

+13.63

SEPP vs. PTRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEPP Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the PTRB Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEPP and PTRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEPPPTRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

1.46

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.42

0.06

+1.37

Drawdowns

SEPP vs. PTRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEPP drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, smaller than the maximum PTRB drawdown of -19.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPP and PTRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEPPPTRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-19.17%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.74%

-2.90%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.61%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-7.64%

+6.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.97%

-0.06%

Volatility

SEPP vs. PTRB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September (SEPP) is 1.28%, while PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that SEPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEPPPTRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

1.37%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.21%

2.83%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.79%

4.01%

+2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.32%

6.25%

+3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.32%

6.25%

+3.07%

SEPP vs. PTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEPP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PTRB's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEPP vs. PTRB - Dividend Comparison

SEPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PTRB
PGIM Total Return Bond ETF
4.74%4.73%5.10%4.62%4.07%0.12%
SEPP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEPP and PTRB have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTRB has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to SEPP (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEPP dropped -11.75% vs PTRB's -19.17%.

On 1-year performance, SEPP leads with 17.87% vs 5.81% for PTRB. On fees, PTRB is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEPP has performed better with a 17.87% return vs 5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTRB is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEPP.

PTRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 0.00% for SEPP.

SEPP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PTRB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SEPP and 0.49% for PTRB.

SEPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEPP and PTRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer