SEPM vs. UXJL
SEPM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - September) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
SEPM vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEPM achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 8.90% return.
SEPM
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- 7.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 8.90%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEPM vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SEPM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - September | 2.68% | 2.78% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 8.90% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEPM and UXJL is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEPM vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank
SEPM
UXJL
SEPM vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - September (SEPM) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEPM | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEPM | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.72 | 1.55 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
SEPM vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEPM drawdown since its inception was -3.88%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEPM and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEPM | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -10.29% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -3.32% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -1.51% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility
SEPM vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEPM | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56% | 14.24% | -11.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.50% | 14.24% | -10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.50% | 14.24% | -10.74% |
SEPM vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SEPM and UXJL have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
SEPM vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SEPM nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SEPM and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEPM and UXJL have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
SEPM and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for SEPM and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer