PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SENEB vs. SXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SENEB vs. SXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB) and Sensient Technologies Corporation (SXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SENEB achieves a 33.03% return, which is significantly higher than SXT's 21.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SENEB has outperformed SXT with an annualized return of 15.60%, while SXT has yielded a comparatively lower 7.22% annualized return.


SENEB

1D
0.00%
1M
5.96%
YTD
33.03%
6M
20.95%
1Y
57.74%
3Y*
47.12%
5Y*
25.40%
10Y*
15.60%

SXT

1D
-0.43%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
21.08%
6M
22.82%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
7.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SENEB vs. SXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SENEB
Seneca Foods Corporation
33.03%37.97%53.72%-14.65%28.51%19.24%-3.66%39.12%-13.32%-19.05%
SXT
Sensient Technologies Corporation
21.08%34.22%10.49%-7.24%-25.61%38.25%14.86%21.00%-22.13%-5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SENEB and SXT is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SENEB:

$1.01B

SXT:

$4.82B

EPS

SENEB:

$12.99

SXT:

$3.38

PE Ratio

SENEB:

11.22

SXT:

33.37

PEG Ratio

SENEB:

0.10

SXT:

5.14

PS Ratio

SENEB:

0.63

SXT:

2.91

PB Ratio

SENEB:

1.41

SXT:

2.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

SENEB:

$1.61B

SXT:

$1.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SENEB:

$202.67M

SXT:

$407.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

SENEB:

$170.76M

SXT:

$266.35M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SENEB vs. SXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SENEB
SENEB Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SENEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SENEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SENEB Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SENEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SENEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SXT
SXT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXT Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENEB vs. SXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB) and Sensient Technologies Corporation (SXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SENEBSXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.16

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

0.73

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

1.30

+6.66

SENEB vs. SXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SENEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the SXT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SENEB and SXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SENEBSXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

0.59

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.24

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.26

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.39

-0.20

Drawdowns

SENEB vs. SXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENEB drawdown since its inception was -53.42%, which is greater than SXT's maximum drawdown of -50.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENEB and SXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SENEBSXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.42%

-50.61%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.32%

-30.70%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.89%

-31.60%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.42%

-47.61%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.42%

-50.61%

-2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.66%

-9.13%

-2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.04%

-12.96%

-9.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.29%

17.13%

-9.84%

Volatility

SENEB vs. SXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB) is 2.76%, while Sensient Technologies Corporation (SXT) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that SENEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SENEBSXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

6.62%

-3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.55%

30.72%

-3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.30%

37.62%

-5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.02%

29.49%

+6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.95%

28.31%

+11.64%

Dividends

SENEB vs. SXT - Dividend Comparison

SENEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SENEB
Seneca Foods Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SXT
Sensient Technologies Corporation
1.45%1.75%2.30%2.48%2.25%1.58%2.11%2.22%2.42%1.68%1.41%1.66%

Financials

SENEB vs. SXT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seneca Foods Corporation and Sensient Technologies Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M450.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
508.35M
435.83M
(SENEB) Total Revenue
(SXT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SENEB vs. SXT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Seneca Foods Corporation and Sensient Technologies Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
16.4%
0
Portfolio components
SENEB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 83.46M and revenue of 508.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.

SXT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sensient Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 435.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SENEB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 59.97M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

SXT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sensient Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 66.73M and revenue of 435.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

SENEB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a net income of 44.77M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.

SXT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sensient Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 44.17M and revenue of 435.83M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SENEB and SXT have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SXT has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to SENEB (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENEB dropped -53.42% vs SXT's -50.61%.

SENEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SENEB and SXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer