SENEA vs. BYRN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SENEA (Seneca Foods Corporation) and BYRN (Byrna Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. SENEA operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while BYRN operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SENEA returned 16.17%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for BYRN. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SENEA vs. BYRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) and Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SENEA achieves a 28.02% return, which is significantly higher than BYRN's -64.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SENEA has outperformed BYRN with an annualized return of 16.17%, while BYRN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.

SENEA

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: 28.02%
• 6M: 19.76%
• 1Y: 51.04%
• 3Y*: 43.67%
• 5Y*: 23.95%
• 10Y*: 16.17%

BYRN

• 1D: -3.22%
• 1M: 12.31%
• YTD: -64.15%
• 6M: -67.12%
• 1Y: -77.29%
• 3Y*: 7.10%
• 5Y*: -23.97%
• 10Y*: 9.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SENEA vs. BYRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SENEA Seneca Foods Corporation	28.02%	39.58%	51.14%	-13.96%	27.11%	20.18%	-2.18%	44.54%	-8.23%	-23.22%
BYRN Byrna Technologies Inc.	-64.15%	-41.72%	350.86%	-18.49%	-41.27%	-7.93%	663.16%	26.67%	7.14%	-30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SENEA and BYRN is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011	0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap SENEA : $977.81M BYRN : $143.45M
EPS SENEA : $12.99 BYRN : $0.37
PE Ratio SENEA : 10.90 BYRN : 16.36
PS Ratio SENEA : 0.61 BYRN : 1.19
PB Ratio SENEA : 1.37 BYRN : 2.16
Total Revenue (TTM) SENEA : $1.61B BYRN : $120.98M
Gross Profit (TTM) SENEA : $202.67M BYRN : $72.95M
EBITDA (TTM) SENEA : $170.76M BYRN : $12.75M

Return for Risk

SENEA vs. BYRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SENEA

SENEA Risk / Return Rank: 77
SENEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SENEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
SENEA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
SENEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
SENEA Martin Ratio Rank: 78

BYRN

BYRN Risk / Return Rank: 4
BYRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BYRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BYRN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BYRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BYRN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENEA vs. BYRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) and Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SENEA	BYRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	-1.02	+2.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	-2.02	+3.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.75	+0.53
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	-0.91	+3.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.96	-1.45	+7.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SENEA vs. BYRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SENEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the BYRN Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SENEA and BYRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SENEA	BYRN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	-1.02	+2.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	-0.33	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.10	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.04	+0.08

Drawdowns

SENEA vs. BYRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENEA drawdown since its inception was -79.33%, smaller than the maximum BYRN drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENEA and BYRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SENEA	BYRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.33%	-92.51%	+13.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.04%	-85.22%	+64.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.03%	-85.49%	+51.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.29%	-92.51%	+41.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.29%	-92.51%	+41.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.35%	-82.39%	+67.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.96%	-52.32%	+11.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.59%	53.47%	-44.88%

Volatility

SENEA vs. BYRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) is 9.05%, while Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a volatility of 15.73%. This indicates that SENEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SENEA	BYRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.05%	15.73%	-6.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.96%	59.34%	-32.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.16%	76.08%	-41.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.41%	73.14%	-37.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.56%	95.29%	-54.73%

Dividends

SENEA vs. BYRN - Dividend Comparison

Neither SENEA nor BYRN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SENEA vs. BYRN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Seneca Foods Corporation and Byrna Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SENEA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 83.46M and revenue of 508.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.

BYRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.40M and revenue of 29.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.

SENEA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 59.97M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

BYRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 928.00K and revenue of 29.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

SENEA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a net income of 44.77M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.

BYRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 801.00K and revenue of 29.05M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SENEA and BYRN in my portfolio?

SENEA and BYRN have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SENEA or BYRN?

BYRN has higher volatility (15.73%) compared to SENEA (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENEA dropped -79.33% vs BYRN's -92.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SENEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.