SEMY vs. SMH
SEMY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEMY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. SEMY is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEMY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
SEMY vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEMY achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return.
SEMY
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 39.32%
- 6M
- 37.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 72.73%
- 6M
- 71.29%
- 1Y
- 138.23%
- 3Y*
- 62.28%
- 5Y*
- 38.18%
- 10Y*
- 37.85%
SEMY vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SEMY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF | 39.32% | -0.56% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.73% | 6.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEMY and SMH is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEMY vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
SEMY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMH
SEMY vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF (SEMY) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEMY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.58 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 33.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEMY vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEMY drawdown since its inception was -11.46%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMY and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEMY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.46% | -84.96% | +73.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -7.01% | +5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -41.01% | +38.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.10% | — |
Volatility
SEMY vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEMY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.93% | 34.87% | -8.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.93% | 35.83% | -9.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.93% | 32.97% | -7.04% |
SEMY vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEMY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEMY vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
SEMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 92.46%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF | 92.46% | 17.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEMY and SMH have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SEMY.
SEMY has the higher dividend yield at 92.46%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
SEMY is categorized as Derivative Income, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SEMY and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for SEMY and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer