SEML.L vs. SXRW.DE
SEML.L (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF) and SXRW.DE (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SEML.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while SXRW.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEML.L returned 1.79%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for SXRW.DE. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEML.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SXRW.DE.
Performance
SEML.L vs. SXRW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SEML.L is traded in GBP, while SXRW.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SXRW.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEML.L achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than SXRW.DE's 8.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SEML.L has underperformed SXRW.DE with an annualized return of 1.79%, while SXRW.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.57% annualized return.
SEML.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 6.67%
- 3Y*
- 4.46%
- 5Y*
- 2.11%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
SXRW.DE
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 21.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.57%
SEML.L vs. SXRW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | 0.87% | 10.31% | -1.20% | 5.42% | -0.23% | -9.48% | -1.55% | 8.21% | 0.03% | 4.91% |
SXRW.DE iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 8.39% | 26.91% | 8.62% | 8.25% | 3.93% | 16.00% | -10.65% | 18.67% | -9.35% | 12.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEML.L and SXRW.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2011 | 0.32 |
The correlation between SEML.L and SXRW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (5 years) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEML.L vs. SXRW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SEML.L
SXRW.DE
SEML.L vs. SXRW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SXRW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEML.L | SXRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 2.46 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.87 | 8.02 | -4.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEML.L vs. SXRW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEML.L drawdown since its inception was -46.67%, which is greater than SXRW.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEML.L and SXRW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEML.L | SXRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.67% | -34.88% | -11.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.78% | -8.89% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.78% | -14.04% | +9.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.11% | -14.04% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.24% | -34.88% | +13.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.68% | -1.50% | -11.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.70% | -4.33% | -22.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 2.74% | -1.02% |
Volatility
SEML.L vs. SXRW.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) is 1.36%, while iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SXRW.DE) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that SEML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEML.L | SXRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 3.00% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.59% | 9.94% | -5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.73% | 11.64% | -5.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 13.16% | -5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.26% | 15.30% | -6.04% |
SEML.L vs. SXRW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEML.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRW.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEML.L vs. SXRW.DE - Dividend Comparison
SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, while SXRW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | 5.65% | 5.44% | 5.55% | 5.05% | 5.25% | 4.58% | 5.13% | 5.44% | 7.30% | 6.75% | 6.78% | 5.18% |
SXRW.DE iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEML.L and SXRW.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXRW.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXRW.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEML.L.
SEML.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SXRW.DE is Europe Equities. SEML.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while SXRW.DE tracks FTSE 100. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SEML.L and 0.07% for SXRW.DE.
Find the right allocation for SEML.L and SXRW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer