SEML.L vs. PHSP.L
SEML.L (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF) and PHSP.L (WisdomTree Physical Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - SEML.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while PHSP.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEML.L returned -2.50%/yr vs 16.46%/yr for PHSP.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEML.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for PHSP.L.
Performance
SEML.L vs. PHSP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SEML.L is traded in GBP, while PHSP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PHSP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEML.L achieves a -3.02% return, which is significantly lower than PHSP.L's 2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SEML.L has underperformed PHSP.L with an annualized return of -2.50%, while PHSP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.46% annualized return.
SEML.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- -3.02%
- 6M
- -2.77%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- -1.63%
- 5Y*
- -3.37%
- 10Y*
- -2.50%
PHSP.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 28.18%
- 1Y
- 115.25%
- 3Y*
- 41.79%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 16.46%
SEML.L vs. PHSP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | -3.02% | 4.32% | -6.40% | 0.23% | -5.32% | -13.17% | -6.26% | 2.59% | -6.78% | -1.81% |
PHSP.L WisdomTree Physical Silver | 2.97% | 129.68% | 22.85% | -6.51% | 15.50% | -12.11% | 40.85% | 12.57% | -3.55% | -5.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEML.L and PHSP.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEML.L vs. PHSP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SEML.L
PHSP.L
SEML.L vs. PHSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEML.L | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.37 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 2.96 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 6.48 | -5.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEML.L | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 2.12 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | 0.67 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.25 | 0.56 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.30 | 0.37 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
SEML.L vs. PHSP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEML.L drawdown since its inception was -66.68%, roughly equal to the maximum PHSP.L drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEML.L and PHSP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEML.L | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.68% | -70.01% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.65% | -38.75% | +33.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.95% | -38.75% | +28.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | -38.75% | +18.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.61% | -38.75% | -0.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.00% | -33.72% | -31.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.41% | -40.07% | -14.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 17.73% | -15.27% |
Volatility
SEML.L vs. PHSP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) is 1.79%, while WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) has a volatility of 16.28%. This indicates that SEML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHSP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEML.L | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 16.28% | -14.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.19% | 51.17% | -45.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.73% | 54.02% | -47.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.32% | 32.98% | -24.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.11% | 29.24% | -19.13% |
SEML.L vs. PHSP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEML.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PHSP.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEML.L vs. PHSP.L - Dividend Comparison
SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while PHSP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSP.L WisdomTree Physical Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEML.L and PHSP.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PHSP.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PHSP.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEML.L.
SEML.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while PHSP.L is Silver. SEML.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while PHSP.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SEML.L and 0.49% for PHSP.L.
Find the right allocation for SEML.L and PHSP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer