PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEML.L vs. JPEE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (JPEE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEML.L is traded in GBP, while JPEE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the JPEE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEML.L achieves a -3.02% return, which is significantly lower than JPEE.L's 2.18% return.


SEML.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.66%
YTD
-3.02%
6M
-2.77%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
-1.63%
5Y*
-3.37%
10Y*
-2.50%

JPEE.L

1D
0.21%
1M
2.02%
YTD
2.18%
6M
1.68%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
-3.02%4.32%-6.40%0.23%-5.32%-13.17%-6.26%2.59%-6.78%-0.69%
JPEE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
2.18%6.06%7.50%4.43%-8.96%-0.44%1.97%11.44%0.06%1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SEML.L and JPEE.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017

0.59

The correlation between SEML.L and JPEE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEML.L vs. JPEE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEML.L
SEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

JPEE.L
JPEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JPEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (JPEE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEML.LJPEE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.37

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

3.09

-2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

8.78

-7.62

SEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEML.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the JPEE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEML.L and JPEE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEML.LJPEE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

2.05

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

0.34

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

0.28

-0.57

Drawdowns

SEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEML.L drawdown since its inception was -66.68%, which is greater than JPEE.L's maximum drawdown of -19.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEML.L and JPEE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEML.LJPEE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.68%

-19.75%

-46.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.65%

-4.03%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.95%

-8.89%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-14.29%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.00%

0.00%

-65.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.41%

-7.47%

-46.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

1.42%

+1.04%

Volatility

SEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (JPEE.L) have volatilities of 1.79% and 1.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEML.LJPEE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

1.81%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.19%

4.39%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.73%

6.08%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.32%

8.90%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.11%

10.20%

-0.09%

SEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEML.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JPEE.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEML.L vs. JPEE.L - Dividend Comparison

SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while JPEE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPEE.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.03%0.05%0.06%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEML.L and JPEE.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPEE.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPEE.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEML.L.

SEML.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while JPEE.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SEML.L and 0.45% for JPEE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEML.L and JPEE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer