PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEML.L vs. DBXD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEML.L vs. DBXD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEML.L is traded in GBP, while DBXD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DBXD.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEML.L achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than DBXD.DE's -1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SEML.L has underperformed DBXD.DE with an annualized return of 1.79%, while DBXD.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.


SEML.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.91%
6M
0.10%
YTD
0.87%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
1.79%

DBXD.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
-2.22%
6M
-4.12%
YTD
-1.66%
1Y
-0.25%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEML.L vs. DBXD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.87%10.31%-1.20%5.42%-0.23%-9.48%-1.55%8.21%0.03%4.91%
DBXD.DE
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
-1.66%29.03%13.03%17.22%-7.96%7.12%8.93%18.20%-17.38%16.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SEML.L and DBXD.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2011

0.39

The correlation between SEML.L and DBXD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (5 years) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEML.L vs. DBXD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEML.L
SEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

DBXD.DE
DBXD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
DBXD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEML.L vs. DBXD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEML.LDBXD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.01

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

-0.02

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.87

-0.06

+3.93

SEML.L vs. DBXD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEML.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the DBXD.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEML.L and DBXD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEML.L vs. DBXD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEML.L drawdown since its inception was -46.67%, roughly equal to the maximum DBXD.DE drawdown of -44.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEML.L and DBXD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEML.LDBXD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.67%

-44.82%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.78%

-12.65%

+7.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.78%

-14.74%

+9.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.11%

-23.63%

+12.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.24%

-34.47%

+13.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.68%

-5.07%

-7.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.70%

-9.08%

-17.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

4.14%

-2.42%

Volatility

SEML.L vs. DBXD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) is 1.36%, while Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that SEML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBXD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEML.LDBXD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

4.70%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.59%

13.47%

-8.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.73%

15.91%

-10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.47%

17.28%

-9.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.26%

18.13%

-8.87%

SEML.L vs. DBXD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEML.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DBXD.DE's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEML.L vs. DBXD.DE - Dividend Comparison

SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, while DBXD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBXD.DE
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
5.65%5.44%5.55%5.05%5.25%4.58%5.13%5.44%7.30%6.75%6.78%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEML.L and DBXD.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DBXD.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBXD.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEML.L.

SEML.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while DBXD.DE is Europe Equities. SEML.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while DBXD.DE tracks DAX®. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SEML.L and 0.09% for DBXD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEML.L and DBXD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer