SEML.L vs. CHFUSD=X
SEML.L (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while CHFUSD=X (USD/CHF) is a currency. Over the past 10 years, SEML.L returned -2.50%/yr vs 2.82%/yr for CHFUSD=X. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SEML.L vs. CHFUSD=X - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SEML.L is traded in GBP, while CHFUSD=X is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CHFUSD=X values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEML.L achieves a -3.02% return, which is significantly lower than CHFUSD=X's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SEML.L has underperformed CHFUSD=X with an annualized return of -2.50%, while CHFUSD=X has yielded a comparatively higher 2.82% annualized return.
SEML.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- -3.02%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- 2.96%
- 3Y*
- -1.63%
- 5Y*
- -3.37%
- 10Y*
- -2.50%
CHFUSD=X
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 2.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.82%
SEML.L vs. CHFUSD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | -3.02% | 4.32% | -6.40% | 0.23% | -5.32% | -13.17% | -6.26% | 2.59% | -6.78% | -1.81% |
CHFUSD=X USD/CHF | 0.49% | 6.40% | -5.68% | 4.34% | 10.39% | -2.05% | 6.21% | -2.60% | 5.29% | -4.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEML.L and CHFUSD=X is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEML.L vs. CHFUSD=X — Risk / Return Rank
SEML.L
CHFUSD=X
SEML.L vs. CHFUSD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and USD/CHF (CHFUSD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEML.L | CHFUSD=X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.14 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 1.21 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 2.42 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEML.L | CHFUSD=X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 0.78 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | 0.47 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.25 | 0.32 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.30 | 0.38 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
SEML.L vs. CHFUSD=X - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEML.L drawdown since its inception was -66.68%, which is greater than CHFUSD=X's maximum drawdown of -24.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEML.L and CHFUSD=X.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEML.L | CHFUSD=X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.68% | -24.45% | -42.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.65% | -3.22% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.95% | -8.50% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | -9.07% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.61% | -14.04% | -25.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.00% | -2.84% | -62.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.41% | -9.61% | -44.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 1.69% | +0.77% |
Volatility
SEML.L vs. CHFUSD=X - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to USD/CHF (CHFUSD=X) at 1.34%. This indicates that SEML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHFUSD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEML.L | CHFUSD=X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 1.34% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.19% | 3.63% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.73% | 5.03% | +1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.32% | 6.99% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.11% | 8.31% | +1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEML.L and CHFUSD=X have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SEML.L and CHFUSD=X
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer