SEMI vs. QQQ
SEMI (Columbia Select Technology ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEMI is a Semiconductors fund actively managed by Columbia, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. SEMI is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEMI returned 30.48%/yr vs 28.89%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEMI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
SEMI vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEMI achieves a 32.72% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.62% return.
SEMI
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 16.66%
- YTD
- 32.72%
- 6M
- 31.75%
- 1Y
- 67.04%
- 3Y*
- 30.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
SEMI vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMI Columbia Select Technology ETF | 32.72% | 24.91% | 15.87% | 45.37% | -21.87% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.62% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -27.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEMI and QQQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2022 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SEMI and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SEMI vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEMI
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SEMI
QQQ
Communication Services
SEMI
QQQ
Financial Services
SEMI
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SEMI
QQQ
Basic Materials
SEMI
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
SEMI
-
QQQ
Energy
SEMI
-
QQQ
Healthcare
SEMI
-
QQQ
Industrials
SEMI
-
QQQ
Real Estate
SEMI
-
QQQ
Utilities
SEMI
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEMI vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SEMI
QQQ
SEMI vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEMI | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.05 | 2.73 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.69 | 3.55 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.47 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 3.71 | +1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.95 | 14.30 | +3.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEMI | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05 | 2.73 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.41 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
SEMI vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEMI drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMI and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEMI | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.93% | -82.97% | +50.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -11.96% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.93% | -22.77% | -10.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -32.79% | +23.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 3.11% | +0.72% |
Volatility
SEMI vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.48%. This indicates that SEMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEMI | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 4.48% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.41% | 12.11% | +5.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.14% | 15.95% | +6.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.59% | 22.39% | +9.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.59% | 22.30% | +9.29% |
SEMI vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEMI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEMI vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
SEMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SEMI Columbia Select Technology ETF | 3.38% | 4.48% | 0.96% | 0.87% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SEMI and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SEMI has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to QQQ (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMI dropped -32.93% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 3-year performance, SEMI leads with 30.48% vs 28.89% for QQQ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEMI has performed better with a 30.48% return vs 28.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SEMI.
SEMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
SEMI is categorized as Semiconductors, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Columbia and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SEMI and 0.18% for QQQ.
SEMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEMI and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer