PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEMI.AS vs. IMAE.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEMI.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc (SEMI.AS) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEMI.AS is traded in USD, while IMAE.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IMAE.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMI.AS achieves a 102.20% return, which is significantly higher than IMAE.AS's 5.67% return.


SEMI.AS

1D
1.73%
1M
31.94%
YTD
102.20%
6M
105.92%
1Y
210.36%
3Y*
61.88%
5Y*
10Y*

IMAE.AS

1D
-0.97%
1M
3.18%
YTD
5.67%
6M
9.13%
1Y
18.46%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMI.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SEMI.AS
iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc
102.20%53.14%15.06%65.69%-35.80%14.84%
IMAE.AS
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
5.67%35.83%2.15%19.65%-14.76%1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMI.AS and IMAE.AS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021

0.60

The correlation between SEMI.AS and IMAE.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEMI.AS vs. IMAE.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMI.AS
SEMI.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SEMI.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMI.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMI.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMI.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMI.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

IMAE.AS
IMAE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IMAE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMI.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc (SEMI.AS) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEMI.ASIMAE.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

1.23

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.16

1.59

+12.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

52.55

5.68

+46.87

SEMI.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMI.AS Sharpe Ratio is 6.36, which is higher than the IMAE.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMI.AS and IMAE.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEMI.ASIMAE.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.36

1.24

+5.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.37

+0.74

Drawdowns

SEMI.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMI.AS drawdown since its inception was -45.27%, which is greater than IMAE.AS's maximum drawdown of -35.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMI.AS and IMAE.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMI.ASIMAE.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.27%

-35.83%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.57%

-11.45%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.23%

-14.96%

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.52%

+2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.40%

-8.19%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

3.23%

+0.72%

Volatility

SEMI.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD Acc (SEMI.AS) has a higher volatility of 13.09% compared to iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) at 5.57%. This indicates that SEMI.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMAE.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMI.ASIMAE.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.09%

5.57%

+7.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.64%

12.29%

+13.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.47%

14.71%

+17.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.59%

17.34%

+14.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.59%

17.70%

+13.89%

SEMI.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMI.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IMAE.AS's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEMI.AS vs. IMAE.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEMI.AS nor IMAE.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SEMI.AS and IMAE.AS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IMAE.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMAE.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SEMI.AS.

SEMI.AS is categorized as Semiconductors, while IMAE.AS is Europe Equities. SEMI.AS tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped Index, while IMAE.AS tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SEMI.AS and 0.20% for IMAE.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMI.AS and IMAE.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer