PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEMB.L vs. VEMA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEMB.L vs. VEMA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEMB.L is traded in GBp, while VEMA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VEMA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMB.L achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than VEMA.L's 1.66% return.


SEMB.L

1D
0.37%
1M
2.16%
YTD
2.75%
6M
2.73%
1Y
14.74%
3Y*
8.83%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
5.65%

VEMA.L

1D
0.22%
1M
1.94%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.43%
1Y
10.75%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMB.L vs. VEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SEMB.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.75%8.06%9.19%6.03%-7.53%0.41%3.12%10.73%
VEMA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
1.66%4.15%8.11%3.45%-5.29%-0.35%2.49%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMB.L and VEMA.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2019

0.94

The correlation between SEMB.L and VEMA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEMB.L vs. VEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMB.L
SEMB.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SEMB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMA.L
VEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMB.L vs. VEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEMB.LVEMA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.33

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

2.44

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

6.67

+5.52

SEMB.L vs. VEMA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMB.L and VEMA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEMB.LVEMA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.83

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.42

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.31

+0.51

Drawdowns

SEMB.L vs. VEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMB.L drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, which is greater than VEMA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMB.L and VEMA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMB.LVEMA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.74%

-14.59%

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.69%

-4.39%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.69%

-8.38%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.70%

-11.41%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.45%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-6.28%

+1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.61%

-0.40%

Volatility

SEMB.L vs. VEMA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) at 1.47%. This indicates that SEMB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMB.LVEMA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

1.47%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

4.07%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

5.85%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.76%

8.14%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

9.49%

+1.18%

SEMB.L vs. VEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMB.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VEMA.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEMB.L vs. VEMA.L - Dividend Comparison

SEMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, while VEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEMB.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.83%7.87%7.27%7.21%6.70%5.35%5.28%6.25%6.15%6.48%6.88%7.10%
VEMA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEMB.L and VEMA.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEMA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEMA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SEMB.L.

Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SEMB.L and 0.25% for VEMA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMB.L and VEMA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer